Long Steady Ride

bigbadwoulfe

Hi, I have a question for you guys. I have been doing pretty much SST/L4 rides the past 7 months already and I'm pretty fit right now. Last Saturday, I did a long ride which lasted 6 hours. I was trying to be home before 12 noon so I kinda kept my pace high and cadence fairly even. The route consited of lots of small hills and 2 bigger climbs. Sunday I did an extended recovery ride with my buddies with very minimal hammering not lasting more than a minute (no sprint effort). Come Monday and Tuesday, my legs were pretty fried. It ached but I still could comfortably walked without the pain affecting the way I walked but I'm pretty sure I can't ride my bike. Wednesday was back to my regular 2x45 SST/L4 ride.

My question is, what kind of training benefit did I gain from the long 6 hour ride that I did? I work 9-5 so I'm usually limited to doing 2x45's and 2x20's most of the time. I have done pretty long rides before and felt the same (legs being fried) I'm planning on doing the same route again this coming Saturday to try to beat my PB. Before doing the long ride, I'd like to know what benefit am I gaining from this ride.

Thanks in advance guys.

Sillyoldtwit

Basically no benefit at all, except getting used to sitting in the saddle for 6 hours. You would gain far more from doing higher quality (higher intensity) L4/5 workouts. This is the area where the bigger engine is built, enabling you to draft comfortably at a higher wattage, and even feel relaxed taking the lead occasionally. I think it was Andy who said he doesn't bother with rides much over 2 hours in preparation for a century race. With the long rides you're doing, you are building up "saddle stamina" but running on a small motor, which won't help you to stay with the leaders.
I'm pretty sure your long Saturday rides are preventing you from concentrating on and putting maximum effort into the engine building L4/5 (and possibly L6). Remember the formula 'Bigger engine = more power = more speed = more satisfaction' Tyson

__________________

bigbadwoulfe

Thanks Sly! In that case, I'll just be doing a trail ride tomorrow. Bust my legs until it pops on the crazy climbs we have (mountain bike ride). More or less it will fall into VO2max workouts but not a structured one. Takes for reminding me to stick to SST/L4/L5 . Yes the Saturday effort took a toll on my weekly workload. I primarily did it because the week was turning out to be a rest week which shouldn't have been in the first place. So my reaction was I needed to play catch up thats why I did the Saturday ride. TSS for last saturday ended up 320+ TSS. I ended up not being able to do my normal routine for this week because of sore legs.

Thanks

Spunout

You benefited a great deal. Increasing your endurance will enable your performance to improve by improving quality and quantity of efforts in the future. In longer races (if these are your goals) you must be able to perform in the finale, and you must be trained to deliver the work (Kilojoules) required.

Get a massage, your active recovery should be very light and less than 1.5 hours. Best to do these hard workouts having a recover day and a day off afterwards.

Sillyoldtwit

Sorry - don't agree. Doing long rides did not increase my endurance one iota.

Instead of doing 4 hour rides in preparation for a century (which just tired me out) I benefitted a lot more by cutting it down to 2-21/2 hours of higher quality and not being fatigued for my L4/L5 workouts during the week.
Doing quality workouts facilitated the building of a bigger engine, allowing me to relax more at the higher wattages generated by the fast guys.
And finishing a 100 miles was a lot easier than struggling to keep up because of a low FTP.
If you want proof, just watch what happens in October in my Lake Biwa 140 km event. Last year on the second stage I couldn't hold the young bucks in the Nagoya City Racing Team. I know from my recent experience of leading a field of 300 riders (not 350 as stated) at the 32km point and feeling strong (before taking the wrong turning) that I shall be up there with them this year all the way to the finish. Tyson

__________________

daveryanwyoming

That's a bit extreme Tyson.

Yeah I rail pretty hard against long steady rides as the basis of a training program but the occasional longer ride isn't a bad idea at all and still provides training benefit. The big problem with a steady diet of LSD riding is lack of overall intensity in the program and the residual fatigue from very long rides that often keep folks from training on subsequent days. But that doesn't mean that a long ride from time to time is a bad idea or useless, especially if it leads into a rest week as the OP mentioned so that it doesn't detract from overall training.

I agree with you Tyson that shorter harder training efforts are better in terms of specific adaptations and a better basis for overall training. But a six hour ride that's ridden quickly is far from useless.

-Dave

Sillyoldtwit

True Dave, but the OP doesn't really tell us how he rode for 6 hours, except to say that he's legs were fried (could be his legs fry easily), and what's more he says he intends to do the same ride again today. To my way of thinking, he's asking for continuously fried legs detracting from overall training (as you mentioned).
I'm not quite sure what he's trying to achieve, apart from as it seems, the challenge of riding for 6 hours. Tyson

__________________

Jono L

Agree completely.

6 hour rides shouldn't be an every day thing but there is a time and a place...

__________________
Classic1-
Don't get me started on triathletes. Sluggo wearing, mechanically inept, dirty, dribbling, elbow steering spawn of Satan. Anyone who sticks food to their bike is a disgrace IMHO.

bigbadwoulfe

The six hour ride was done below threshold but was intense enough so that I am breathing deep all through out. I tried to maintain around 210 watts and never go below that. My goal was the ride to be on the tempo side. Rolling terrain and two 30 minute climbs pushed me to threshold at times but I just try to catch my breath during the ride down. I probably wouldn't do it again seeing that this week turned to be a rest week instead of a regular training week. Also I gained 1.5 kilos this week as a result of the extended recovery and general distaste for the bike. TSS last week was in the 800 area, this week only about 400+. Will probably stay with SST/L4/L5 from now on except for some occasional long group rides for fun. Thanks for the advice everyone

lmno609

Far from our homes
The heat will flash behind the dash
It gathers - such winds blow cold
The fiction of your life's love so deep in the blood
Taking pictures of all of this
Right down the history in the case that we are missed
Far from our homes
The heat will flash
It gathers - such winds blow cold
The fiction of your life's love so deep in the blood

we are a group of wow power level service supplier. http://www.wowgold800.com is one of the sites in our group. As you see, we provide the professional world of warcraft power leveling and power leveling service at all. Don't be confused, because we have to make us undivided although we may know that there are more margins in wow powerleveling . We have been offering world of warcraft gold service for years.
http://www.wowgold1000.com

jD_Empath

thanks to the spambot for bringing this thread back. (are there any moderators on this forum at all? that Spambot needs to be banned)

I think LSD (on occasions) is a good training idea.

What is the likelihood that racers who finish high in the leadville 100 don't do long distance rides? I would think very low. A friend of mine who finished in under 8 hours has an amazing engine, but his real best quality is *endurance*.

FreeHueco

IMO, you should do an LSD ride about every two weeks (and it should get longer and faster as you get stronger). Just don't push so hard that you can't ride the next day. But still take it easy the next day!

My example is this: yesterday I did a steady 75 miles followed by an easier 24 (forced because of lots of signal lights). The 75 included one major hill and lots of rollers out along the coast. My pace was my target pace for a double century (my goal is a sub 11:30 double in the next year). Today all I did was an easy 41 miles around town...

The benefit? Slowly increasing my endurance. The shorter rides are for building the power... I do intervals and fartleks while commuting.

__________________
" Life sucks, but work is really cool." -Travis Hugh Culley

http://mikedeitchman.blogspot.com/

Bianchi San Jose (SS or Fixed)
Rock Lobster Steel CX (w/SRAM Force)

whoawhoa

I think you'll find table 2 on this page interesting: http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/power411/levels.asp

Training from l2-l4 is pretty similar in the types of adaptations that occur, what's different is the magnitude of the adaptation given a certain amount of training. This is offset by your bodies ability to tolerate much larger doses of lower-intensity training.

I'll beat the interval/intensity drum pretty hard for anyone who's time limited, but the idea that longer training rides are useless seems silly. Training for endurance sports is mostly a matter of doing as high a dose of aerobic training as can be recoverd from. The best fitness I've ever had came off a week where I did two 4 hour climbing races and a 7 hour training ride, followed by a few days of sleeping and eating all day.

I do think 6 hours may be a bit excessive in your case, since it sounds like it compromised your midweek workouts. My advice would be to find a length of quality l2/l3 ride that still allows you to recover fairly quickly.

I do agree that

Roadie_scum

I think the problem with LSD is the 'S' = slow. For some events it doesn't hurt to get some long rides in, but you still have to be training. FLandis is no longer one of my favourite riders (exogenous test doesn't just 'appear'), but I liked his quote when asked if he did long slow rides. Something along the lines of "no, because I don't do any long slow races". I know a few people who have had success building up their tempo/endurance rides to 300W for 5-6 hours. That's still training, mos def. Piddling along at <50% threshold really isn't.