Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
29-06.-2008, 09:00 AM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
OK Let's Play Nice
I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating manner.
Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a little less demeanor. |
|
|
29-06.-2008, 09:14 AM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: OK Let's Play Nice
Tom Kunich wrote:
> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating > manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group > so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a little > less demeanor. > 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor. 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with facts, let alone a dictionary. [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?] |
|
|
|
29-06.-2008, 09:59 AM
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: OK Let's Play Nice
"jim beam" wrote:
> Tom Kunich wrote: >> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating >> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group >> so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a little >> less demeanor. >> > > 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not > the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor. > > 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with > facts, let alone a dictionary. > > [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?] Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle! -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
29-06.-2008, 10:43 AM
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: OK Let's Play Nice
Tom Sherman wrote:
> "jim beam" wrote: >> Tom Kunich wrote: >>> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating >>> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical >>> group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a >>> little less demeanor. >>> >> >> 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not >> the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor. >> >> 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with >> facts, let alone a dictionary. >> >> [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?] > > Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle! > and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless lightweight "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes. |
|
|
|
29-06.-2008, 11:14 AM
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: OK Let's Play Nice
"jim beam" wrote:
> Tom Sherman wrote: >> "jim beam" wrote: >>> Tom Kunich wrote: >>>> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating >>>> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical >>>> group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a >>>> little less demeanor. >>>> >>> >>> 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not >>> the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor. >>> >>> 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with >>> facts, let alone a dictionary. >>> >>> [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?] >> >> Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle! >> > > and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless lightweight > "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes. > Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
29-06.-2008, 11:17 AM
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: OK Let's Play Nice
Tom Sherman wrote:
> "jim beam" wrote: >> Tom Sherman wrote: >>> "jim beam" wrote: >>>> Tom Kunich wrote: >>>>> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating >>>>> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical >>>>> group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a >>>>> little less demeanor. >>>>> >>>> >>>> 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, >>>> not the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a >>>> demeanor. >>>> >>>> 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with >>>> facts, let alone a dictionary. >>>> >>>> [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?] >>> >>> Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle! >>> >> >> and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless >> lightweight "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes. >> > Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be? > since when was calling a bullshitter on their bullshit "stalking"??? goddamned factless, useless, meaningless lightweight. |
|
|
|
29-06.-2008, 12:40 PM
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: OK Let's Play Nice
Tom Sherman wrote:
> "jim beam" wrote: >> Tom Sherman wrote: >>> "jim beam" wrote: >>>> Tom Kunich wrote: >>>>> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating >>>>> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical >>>>> group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a >>>>> little less demeanor. >>>>> >>>> >>>> 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, >>>> not the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a >>>> demeanor. >>>> >>>> 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with >>>> facts, let alone a dictionary. >>>> >>>> [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?] >>> >>> Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle! >>> >> >> and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless >> lightweight "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes. >> > Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be? > I know which one is de more knowledgeable, but which one is de meaner? Mark J. |
|
|
Linear Mode
