![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
tholub wrote: > > > > > - The rider is more important than the unicycle. - Everyone is fastest on the setup they're most comfortable with - It's possible to go up hills (up to a certain grade) faster on a > geared uni than a fixed 36er, at a cost of greater energy > expenditure - Geared unis are faster downhill and require less energy than a > fixed 36er - Did I mention, the rider is more important than the unicycle? > > > > I've got to agree with all of those points. Yes, geared hubs give you a mechanical advantage, but they don't make your legs 1.5 times a big. I found myself catching the only gunis that we were riding with on long, gentle uphills and downhills. They'd take off on the flats and most steep hills (up or down). I hope that if RTL happens again, there will be separate categories for geared and fixed unicycles, since there is a significant mechanical advantage at a price that not everyone can afford. -- Eroick --Eric Evenchick Email/MSN: eevench@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eroick's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10884 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/70892 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I disagree with this. Had this been a bike race, pretty much every bike would be more expensive than a GUni. If you wanna race, you got to show up with equipment that will play to your abilities. Adding $1k to the cost of your cycle isn't really a hardship if you're serious about racing. Unless you live in a third world country, any teenager with a summer job can save up that much money. If you're NOT WILLING to spend that much money, you can still show up and race competitively, just not expect to win. Not only that, but many ungeared riders were competitive with geared riders. If you had taken away NZuni's only geared cycle, they may have still taken 2nd place. There were many GUnis in the middle of the pack, and one or two towards the back of the pack. For many, travel, accomodations, car rental...etc were as expensive or more expensive than their unicycles. Eroick wrote: > > I hope that if RTL happens again, there will be separate categories for > geared and fixed unicycles, since there is a significant mechanical > advantage at a price that not everyone can afford. -- mscalisi ><> Unicycle for (reducing the) Buddha <>< ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mscalisi's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4961 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/70892 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
mscalisi wrote: > > For many, travel, accomodations, car rental...etc were as expensive or > more expensive than their unicycles. Agreed. The difference in cost between my Schlumpf hub and a decent fixed hub is a relatively small percentage of the total cost that I spent on everything else. I didn't buy the guni specifically for RTL, but if I didn't already have it, I'm sure I could have justified the cost to give myself a fighting chance in the race. STM -- semach.the.monkey ------------------------------------------------------------------------ semach.the.monkey's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12078 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/70892 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
mscalisi wrote: > > > Not only that, but many ungeared riders were competitive with geared > riders. If you had taken away NZuni's only geared cycle, they may have > still taken 2nd place. There were many GUnis in the middle of the pack, > and one or two towards the back of the pack. > > For many, travel, accomodations, car rental...etc were as expensive or > more expensive than their unicycles. Totally agree. I lucked out and got some unexpected well paid work in march that kept my cash flow positive, paid for flights etc. But even so it cost a lot getting there and stuff. I think overall including food car hire etc i probably spent 800 quid 1600 dollars. Separate categories are silly, they only make sense if you separate by what actual gearing you have as geared 36 is v different to 29. And what about brakes - they can give a speed advantage and reduce effort a lot. Should they have another category? If the biggest race ever only has 35 teams it's silly to split them up based on how pimpy their unicycle is. Joe -- joemarshall my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/70892 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
joemarshall wrote: > Totally agree. I lucked out and got some unexpected well paid work in > march that kept my cash flow positive, paid for flights etc. But even > so it cost a lot getting there and stuff. I think overall including > food car hire etc i probably spent 800 quid 1600 dollars. > > Separate categories are silly, they only make sense if you separate by > what actual gearing you have as geared 36 is v different to 29. And > what about brakes - they can give a speed advantage and reduce effort a > lot. Should they have another category? If the biggest race ever only > has 35 teams it's silly to split them up based on how pimpy their > unicycle is. > > Joe If it were to have any separate categories, it would have to be a significant. Having a category with brakes/no brakes is just silly. Having Geared and Ungeared category less so I think. Also, male/female categories would make sense if there were enough female teams too. -- GizmoDuck The Uninam Tour 2008.....Hanoi to Saigon!!! www.uninam.net The SINZ Unicycle Tour 2007....South Island, New Zealand www.sinzuni.org The Induni Unicycle Tour 2009. Unicycle Tour of India. Email me for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GizmoDuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/794 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/70892 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|