![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm looking to get a 4 bike rack for my car. It seems that a towball
mounted rack is the way to go and the Tradekar Take Four has my eye at the moment. Anybody had experience of this model? Any other hints, tips or gotchas? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"POHB" <google@hayward.uk.net> wrote in message news:b5c656be-fccd-4fa2-8a60-ef0b78d40ddb@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com... > I'm looking to get a 4 bike rack for my car. It seems that a towball > mounted rack is the way to go and the Tradekar Take Four has my eye at > the moment. Anybody had experience of this model? Any other hints, > tips or gotchas? Haven't got that particular model, but I do have the Tradekar Silverbike II with third bike adapter (the model with the tilt mechanism, so I can still access boot of car when the bike rike is on the tow ball). My experience with Tradekar is that the model I have is well designed, well made and easy to attach to the car and to detach yet is quite solid when in use. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:16:47 -0700 (PDT), POHB
<google@hayward.uk.net> said in <b5c656be-fccd-4fa2-8a60-ef0b78d40ddb@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>: >I'm looking to get a 4 bike rack for my car. It seems that a towball >mounted rack is the way to go and the Tradekar Take Four has my eye at >the moment. Anybody had experience of this model? Any other hints, >tips or gotchas? I have one of they, it is heavy but strong. You need a car with a decent nose weight rating on the towbar, I used a Volvo estate with rear spring assisters. It comes with lights and wiring, which is good. Loading is not trivial, takes 20 minutes or more, but it took that long to load the rack we bought for the Honda so I don't think it's a problem. Once loaded you're unlikely to be able to open the boot, though. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 23 Jun, 14:08, "Just zis Guy, you know?" <u...@ftc.gov> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:16:47 -0700 (PDT), POHB > <goo...@hayward.uk.net> said in > <b5c656be-fccd-4fa2-8a60-ef0b78d40...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>: > > >I'm looking to get a 4 bike rack for my car. It seems that a towball > >mounted rack is the way to go and the Tradekar Take Four has my eye > I have one of they, it is heavy but strong. You need a car with a > decent nose weight rating on the towbar, Looks nice from the pictures, and I like the integrated lights and number plate mount. I've got an older MaxxRaxx which is bit agricultural but feels very solid: it has the merit of supporting every bike frame individually, and of the supports being detachable if you're carrying fewer bikes. The Pendle Wheel Support was the other four-bike one to look at when I acquired mine. And yes, I'd second Guy's point about the nose weight rating - it's very easy to exceed this unless it's at least 75kg. John |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <eu7v54piofdoh9flv6n46pqvcq4gpdu3rh@4ax.com>, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:16:47 -0700 (PDT), POHB ><google@hayward.uk.net> said in ><b5c656be-fccd-4fa2-8a60-ef0b78d40ddb@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>: > >>I'm looking to get a 4 bike rack for my car. It seems that a towball >>mounted rack is the way to go and the Tradekar Take Four has my eye at >>the moment. Anybody had experience of this model? Any other hints, >>tips or gotchas? > >I have one of they, it is heavy but strong. I have one of these http://preview.tinyurl.com/52kj2s which is cheaper (because I had roof bar mounted carriers already), but the Tradekar looks easier to mount. (And easier to fit four bikes on - now our children's bikes are different sizes I can probably shuffle the racks on the Wilstow to fit four on, which I couldn't with the bikes we were using when I first got it, but you might want to check the particular four bikes you care about do fit without hitting each other. But if all four of us are going somewhere together, I can get a bike off the roof, which my wife couldn't without me, so it hasn't actually been a problem.) > You need a car with a >decent nose weight rating on the towbar http://preview.tinyurl.com/6f9qrp looks an interesting way around that - single wheel that takes some of the weight, but it castors so that reversing with it on is easier than with a normal small trailer - at least that's the theory, I don't know how well it works in practice. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 23 Jun 2008 16:33:46 +0100 (BST), armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk
(Alan Braggins) said in <slrng5vgiq.oko.armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk>: >http://preview.tinyurl.com/6f9qrp looks an interesting way around that - >single wheel that takes some of the weight, but it castors so that >reversing with it on is easier than with a normal small trailer - at least >that's the theory, I don't know how well it works in practice. I'm pretty sure that would count as a trailer, with consequent reduction in maximum permitted speed. Pendle sell a six-bike trailer, which also looks good. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <69pv54d7r2qmdu0es5cfko51hba1obrm0u@4ax.com>, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>On 23 Jun 2008 16:33:46 +0100 (BST), armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk >(Alan Braggins) said in ><slrng5vgiq.oko.armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk>: > [Of nose weight limits on towbar mounted racks:] >>http://preview.tinyurl.com/6f9qrp looks an interesting way around that - >>single wheel that takes some of the weight, but it castors so that >>reversing with it on is easier than with a normal small trailer - at least >>that's the theory, I don't know how well it works in practice. > >I'm pretty sure that would count as a trailer, with consequent >reduction in maximum permitted speed. True, but with the air resistance of four bikes and today's fuel prices you might want to slow down however you carry them. Assuming you can't just do the whole journey by bike, of course. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 24 Jun, 08:30, a...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Alan Braggins) wrote:
> True, but with the air resistance of four bikes and today's fuel prices > you might want to slow down however you carry them. Assuming you > can't just do the whole journey by bike, of course. Indeed, this will mostly be used for those family holidays with loads of luggage, camping gear, children etc. and will mean that apart from the journey there and back the car can be used less while we're there. I read (AA IIRC) that towball racks were the least bad wind-resistant way of hanging bikes on the outside of a car, but with my experience of roof boxes I'm sure it won't be great for fuel economy. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"POHB" <google@hayward.uk.net> wrote in message news:b5c656be-fccd-4fa2-8a60-ef0b78d40ddb@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com... > I'm looking to get a 4 bike rack for my car. It seems that a towball > mounted rack is the way to go and the Tradekar Take Four has my eye at > the moment. Anybody had experience of this model? Any other hints, > tips or gotchas? We got a Hollywood F4 a couple of years ago, although we've not used it often, it works very well with 4 up, and puts the bikes closer to the COG than a trailer ball mounting one. It'll depend on your vehicle shape, but you may find that you can fit it so the bikes are lifted clear of the number plate & lights so you won't necessarily need to get a light bar. As you've probably found there aren't many 4 bike racks, but the Hollywood is OK. Another benefit is that it folds down out of the way when you're not using it. Here's a link http://www.jejamescycles.co.uk/id18335.html |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 24 Jun 2008 08:30:16 +0100 (BST), armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk
(Alan Braggins) said in <slrng618k8.185.armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk>: >, but with the air resistance of four bikes and today's fuel prices >you might want to slow down however you carry them. Assuming you can't >just do the whole journey by bike, of course. I averaged 31mpg driving home from Wales with the four bikes on the back of the Volvo and a triplet on the roof. A 2.5 litre turbocharged Volvo with the aircon on. I've never quite understood how. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-06-24, Just zis Guy, you know? <uce@ftc.gov> wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2008 08:30:16 +0100 (BST), armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk > (Alan Braggins) said in ><slrng618k8.185.armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk>: > >>, but with the air resistance of four bikes and today's fuel prices >>you might want to slow down however you carry them. Assuming you can't >>just do the whole journey by bike, of course. > > I averaged 31mpg driving home from Wales with the four bikes on the > back of the Volvo and a triplet on the roof. A 2.5 litre > turbocharged Volvo with the aircon on. > > I've never quite understood how. Maybe the bikes broke up the vortex created by the vertical flat back of the Volvo and actually improved drag. |
|