![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:14:51 -0500
Jon <jonmein@none.non> wrote: > In this case, I really am interested in why people, particularly > recumbent cyclists, think cycling is "dangerous" or not. Most people act on first instinct about something new. They seldom think. If called they will search for justification to back up their instinct. Actually *thinking* about things is difficult. Few are trained to, few wish to put the effort in. It's hard, and it means you have to question yourself, maybe go against that snap judgement. Zebee |
|