![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 28, 1:56*pm, Mark <i...@getlotsofspamthankstoplus.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:59:03 +0100, Nick <Nick.S...@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > > >spindrift wrote: > >>http://www.lcc.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=1145 > > >> The evidence seems clear to me, motorbikes are faster moving, heavier, > >> and pose a greater risk to cyclists. > > >I'd sign one to ban buses from bus lanes but I don't have a problem with > >motorbikes. > > Me too. > > To the OP: Since when have motorbikes been heavier than busses? They're not, but they're less politically correct than buses, and they don't fit into Spindrift's plans for a socialist state. |
|