![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In the process of buying one (Giant Sedona) after not having cycled for a very
long time. The guy seemed to think that a size 14 frame (XS) was right for me even though I'm 5' 7" tall (or short). Does this size sound correct - I though I'd be taking a larger size than this ? Thanks. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"David Springthrope" <david.springthrope@idxx.com.au> wrote in message news:39rd24duu74nabpcmfltovshpfhgi1p7rl@4ax.com... > In the process of buying one (Giant Sedona) after not having cycled for a > very > long time. The guy seemed to think that a size 14 frame (XS) was right for > me > even though I'm 5' 7" tall (or short). Does this size sound correct - I > though > I'd be taking a larger size than this ? > > Thanks. I have just sold a Sedona, but only because I needed to purge my bicycle fleet. Giants are nice bikes and quite well specified. I am also 5'7'' tall and unless you have a peculiar physique a 14" or XS size Sedona is going to be too small for you. I rode a 17" or S size Sedona and in retrospect I could have done with a 19" or M size because I had the seat post at full height in order to get the right leg extension when pedalling. My crotch measurement or Pubic Bone Height is 82cm. Go here http://www.rivbike.com/article/bike...w_to_measure_it and those nice folks at Rivendell Bicycle Works will tell you how to measure yours. http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-au...yle/1135/28954/ for geometry of Sedona. PH |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"David Springthrope" <david.springthrope@idxx.com.au> wrote in message news:39rd24duu74nabpcmfltovshpfhgi1p7rl@4ax.com... > In the process of buying one (Giant Sedona) after not having cycled for a > very > long time. The guy seemed to think that a size 14 frame (XS) was right for > me > even though I'm 5' 7" tall (or short). Does this size sound correct - I > though > I'd be taking a larger size than this ? > > Thanks. No - the 14" is too small for you unless you're proportioned a lot diffrently from the average. At 5'7" I'd recommend a 17" or even a 19" (I'm 5'8" and ride a 19" in general). Since you're a newbie I'd be mention the 17" (because the suspension seatpost doesn't allow the seat to go as far down) with a view to trading up in a couple of years as you stretch into position. Alternatively, try a 19" and if the seat doesn't go down far enough for you change out the suspension post (keep it for later). My first pick would be the 19" as a long term prospect. It'll fit you better as you become more used to cycling. It's coming to the end of the Giant stock year. It may be that your guy is trying to dispose of stock before the new stuff arrives. I see it a lot in my shop when newbies come in with badly fitted bikes. On the weekend we had a 6'4" guy on a 14" Yukon he'd bought elsewhere (one of the franchised chain stores). He was after a longer stem because he felt cramped up. poor sod's knees were nearly up around his ears! My advice is to go to another shop. Cheers, Frank |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
David Springthrope wrote:
> In the process of buying one (Giant Sedona) after not having cycled for a very > long time. The guy seemed to think that a size 14 frame (XS) was right for me > even though I'm 5' 7" tall (or short). Does this size sound correct - I though > I'd be taking a larger size than this ? I am only 5' 8" tall (well short) as well and I own and ride a 17" and a 19". I have short legs for my height and I am just as comfortable on the 19" as the 17" (I reckon an 18" would be perfect for me). I'd be very surprised if a 14 isn't way too small for you... G-S |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 11 May 2008 23:03:30 +1000, David Springthrope
<david.springthrope@idxx.com.au> wrote: >In the process of buying one (Giant Sedona) after not having cycled for a very >long time. The guy seemed to think that a size 14 frame (XS) was right for me >even though I'm 5' 7" tall (or short). Does this size sound correct - I though >I'd be taking a larger size than this ? > >Thanks. Looks like I'll have to get back to them urgently - they (won't say who, but in Sydney) were ordering one in for me. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:15:39 +1000, David Springthrope
<david.springthrope@idxx.com.au> wrote: >Looks like I'll have to get back to them urgently - they (won't say who, but in >Sydney) were ordering one in for me. Went back and got re-measured by someone more senior and we both agreed the next size up was more suitable. The Giant specifications I viewed in another shop as an independent check showed that at 5' 6" (I must have shrunk !) I was right in the middle of the range for the preferred size (17"). Because of run-out of stock (not just at the shop) I had to go up a model but I got a good deal off RRP. Thanks. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
David Springthrope:
> In the process of buying one (Giant Sedona) after not having cycled for a very > long time. The guy seemed to think that a size 14 frame (XS) was right for me > even though I'm 5' 7" tall (or short). Does this size sound correct - I though > I'd be taking a larger size than this ? I'm about your height and, from: http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-AU...yle/1135/28954/ I'd be getting the XS. -- HTH, Steve = : ^ ) |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
David Springthrope: > On Sun, 11 May 2008 23:03:30 +1000, David Springthrope > <david.springthrope@idxx.com.au> wrote: > >> In the process of buying one (Giant Sedona) after not having cycled for a >> very >> long time. The guy seemed to think that a size 14 frame (XS) was right for me >> even though I'm 5' 7" tall (or short). Does this size sound correct - I >> though >> I'd be taking a larger size than this ? >> >> Thanks. > > Looks like I'll have to get back to them urgently - they (won't say who, but > in > Sydney) were ordering one in for me. Hmmm. Well it looks like I'm full of sh1t. I was looking at the top tube length and comparing that to my road bike, and 540 is about the longest I'm comfortable with. -- Steve = : ^ ) |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"David Springthrope" <david.springthrope@idxx.com.au> wrote in message news:abpf24hqbulif6a5rskbjcctvr9ib2hl4r@4ax.com... > On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:15:39 +1000, David Springthrope > <david.springthrope@idxx.com.au> wrote: > >>Looks like I'll have to get back to them urgently - they (won't say who, but in >>Sydney) were ordering one in for me. > > Went back and got re-measured by someone more senior and we both agreed the next > size up was more suitable. The Giant specifications I viewed in another shop as > an independent check showed that at 5' 6" (I must have shrunk !) I was right in > the middle of the range for the preferred size (17"). Because of run-out of > stock (not just at the shop) I had to go up a model but I got a good deal off > RRP. > > Thanks. 17". If your arms are very long, get a longer stem. Otherwise fine. My brother has a Giant. T. |
|