![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Exactly what I have been saying for about 15 years. Mountain bikers
are VERY slow to admit the truth. Mike To: cree_anthony <anthony@lifetime.oregonstate.edu> From: "Ronald Long" <ronald.long@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 08:51:52 -0700 Subject: Re: House approves Wild Sky wilderness in Washington state If there's one thing I've learned since joining the BBTC, it's how unbelievably naive I used to be - thinking that of course mountain bikers would be environmentalists. I may be the only one on this list, but I'm delighted that the Wild Sky wilderness area was created. I agree that it's unfortunate and wrong that bikes are excluded from places that horses are allowed, and would love to help change that. But the world is much bigger than the one we see with our "I wanna ride there" blinders on, and, in that larger world, there is a desperate need to preserve places that are relatively untouched by us wonderful humans. If you can't relate to the spiritual value of those places, perhaps you can think of them as repositories of fascinating DNA, that the drug companies will get around to exploiting to create new drugs. ronald On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:50 PM, cree_anthony <anthony@lifetime.oregonstate.edu> wrote: > Of course, now they'll move on to the next 'last unprotected stand of > whatever'. With this having portions that have been previously logged > and roads and bridges in it, this proposal didn't even meet the > requirements of the Wilderness act, that's why Pombo had killed it a > couple years ago. > > I wonder if the mtn biking president who signed this into law realized > it closed a trail currently open to bikes. > > --- In bbtcmembers@yahoogroups.com, CraigSMcKinnon@... wrote: > > > > Does this mean that all the wilderness crew will now focus there > efforts to > > the next wilderness area, at mt bikers expense? In the name of > wilderness. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|