![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Keats wrote:
> In article <fvc981$elc$1@registered.motzarella.org>, > Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> writes: >> Tom Keats wrote: >>> In article <ZcXyi.14446$B25.4428@news01.roc.ny>, >>> Arif Khokar <akhokar1234@wvu.edu> writes: >>>> Second, it's the >>>> responsibility for those who don't have the right of way to wait for a >>>> suitable gap in traffic before proceeding. That means that cyclists and >>>> drivers waiting to turn or cross an intersection must wait for traffic >>>> to clear before proceeding. >>> That's what non-suicidal, rational people do. >>> Despite popular opinion, people who aren't operating >>> motor vehicles aren't /that/ idiotic. >>> >> Ever ride your bicycle on a college campus? > > Yes. > >> Yes, people are that >> idiotic, and rush into the street in the middle of the block without >> looking. That is why I preferred to ride a 'bent, so I would not fly >> over the bars and land on my head if one of the idiots took me out (been >> there, done that, earlier in life). > > I've /never/ run into anyone with my uprights. > I refuse to slow down for idiots. >> Many of the cyclists are not any better. I have been hit a couple of >> times while walking by sidewalk riders - one overtaking from behind >> (clipped by the end of the handlebars) and one who was coming around a >> blind corner hugging the building wall > > I don't particularly like habitual > sidewalk cycling. That said, I've > never been hit by a sidewalk rider. > Maybe you have been in a less crowded area. >> I was recently almost hit by a >> fixie poseur who was making a right turn on red without stopping or >> yielding. > > Car drivers do that a lot. I guess he was > a car driver on a bike. There are all too > many of those. > The guy is lucky he avoided me, since he would likely have landed on his face. Hitting a pedestrian while riding an upright usually is much worse for the rider. >> Notice that none of these incidents involve the dreaded steel and glass >> cage. > > I notice that you lived to tell the tale. > The one incident with an upright involved several children running out in front of me while being screened from view by a parked vehicle. I was able to slow to less than 15 mph before the collision with an estimated 70 pound child (I probably weighed about 105 pounds at the time). The result was a nasty scalp wound for me, a bent fork on my Peugeot, and a minor scratch on the idiotic child's knee. Had I been riding a proper recumbent, the outcome would have been much more in my favor. > I guess you're sharp enough to survive all > these dreaded onslaughts. > Hey, if a moron on a bike wants to run into me when I am a pedestrian and have the right-of-way, I will lead with my shoulder. > Heck, I survive & thrive well enough with > my ~normal~ bikes. > > I don't need to look to other configs > to make-up for my judgmental mistakes. > How is having others violate one's right-of-way a judgmental mistake? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <fvdu8e$gnq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> writes: >>>>> Second, it's the >>>>> responsibility for those who don't have the right of way to wait for a >>>>> suitable gap in traffic before proceeding. That means that cyclists and >>>>> drivers waiting to turn or cross an intersection must wait for traffic >>>>> to clear before proceeding. >>>> That's what non-suicidal, rational people do. >>>> Despite popular opinion, people who aren't operating >>>> motor vehicles aren't /that/ idiotic. >>>> >>> Ever ride your bicycle on a college campus? >> >> Yes. >> >>> Yes, people are that >>> idiotic, and rush into the street in the middle of the block without >>> looking. That is why I preferred to ride a 'bent, so I would not fly >>> over the bars and land on my head if one of the idiots took me out (been >>> there, done that, earlier in life). >> >> I've /never/ run into anyone with my uprights. >> > I refuse to slow down for idiots. I refuse to run-over anybody. Even the cognitively challenged. Your above statement sounds so Car Driver-ish. Sometimes we all have to slow down. Sometimes we all have to speed up. Nobody has to hurt anybody just because they're operating a certain kind of vehicle. >>> Many of the cyclists are not any better. I have been hit a couple of >>> times while walking by sidewalk riders - one overtaking from behind >>> (clipped by the end of the handlebars) and one who was coming around a >>> blind corner hugging the building wall >> >> I don't particularly like habitual >> sidewalk cycling. That said, I've >> never been hit by a sidewalk rider. >> > Maybe you have been in a less crowded area. Heh. >>> I was recently almost hit by a >>> fixie poseur who was making a right turn on red without stopping or >>> yielding. >> >> Car drivers do that a lot. I guess he was >> a car driver on a bike. There are all too >> many of those. >> > The guy is lucky he avoided me, since he would likely have landed on his > face. Hitting a pedestrian while riding an upright usually is much worse > for the rider. It's bad all around. >>> Notice that none of these incidents involve the dreaded steel and glass >>> cage. >> >> I notice that you lived to tell the tale. >> > The one incident with an upright involved several children running out > in front of me while being screened from view by a parked vehicle. I was > able to slow to less than 15 mph before the collision with an estimated > 70 pound child (I probably weighed about 105 pounds at the time). The > result was a nasty scalp wound for me, a bent fork on my Peugeot, and a > minor scratch on the idiotic child's knee. > > Had I been riding a proper recumbent, the outcome would have been much > more in my favor. How so? Would there have been less hurtin' of people all around? >> I guess you're sharp enough to survive all >> these dreaded onslaughts. >> > Hey, if a moron on a bike wants to run into me when I am a pedestrian > and have the right-of-way, I will lead with my shoulder. If you say so. >> Heck, I survive & thrive well enough with >> my ~normal~ bikes. >> >> I don't need to look to other configs >> to make-up for my judgmental mistakes. >> > How is having others violate one's right-of-way a judgmental mistake? The decision to retaliate is always a mistake. Try not to retaliate. That just emits more bad vibes into the world. There are usually more artful solutions than BF&I. Often the solution is the realization that one is one of many mistake-prone people. This world needs more good vibes. Let's make 'em. Lead 'em in with your shoulder & your heart & your pedal-pumpin'. And screw ego. cheers, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Keats wrote:
> In article <fvdu8e$gnq$1@registered.motzarella.org>, > Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> writes: > >>>>>> Second, it's the >>>>>> responsibility for those who don't have the right of way to wait for a >>>>>> suitable gap in traffic before proceeding. That means that cyclists and >>>>>> drivers waiting to turn or cross an intersection must wait for traffic >>>>>> to clear before proceeding. >>>>> That's what non-suicidal, rational people do. >>>>> Despite popular opinion, people who aren't operating >>>>> motor vehicles aren't /that/ idiotic. >>>>> >>>> Ever ride your bicycle on a college campus? >>> Yes. >>> >>>> Yes, people are that >>>> idiotic, and rush into the street in the middle of the block without >>>> looking. That is why I preferred to ride a 'bent, so I would not fly >>>> over the bars and land on my head if one of the idiots took me out (been >>>> there, done that, earlier in life). >>> I've /never/ run into anyone with my uprights. >>> >> I refuse to slow down for idiots. > > I refuse to run-over anybody. Even the cognitively challenged. They are not cognitively challenged, but rather deliberately behaving in an anti-social manner. Why should anti-social behavior be rewarded? > Your above statement sounds so Car Driver-ish. > People who violate the rules of society and common sense have no right to complain if something bad happens as a consequence. > Sometimes we all have to slow down. Sometimes we all > have to speed up. Nobody has to hurt anybody just because > they're operating a certain kind of vehicle. > Stop insinuating assumptions about my behavior that are not true. >>>> Many of the cyclists are not any better. I have been hit a couple of >>>> times while walking by sidewalk riders - one overtaking from behind >>>> (clipped by the end of the handlebars) and one who was coming around a >>>> blind corner hugging the building wall >>> I don't particularly like habitual >>> sidewalk cycling. That said, I've >>> never been hit by a sidewalk rider. >>> >> Maybe you have been in a less crowded area. > > Heh. > >>>> I was recently almost hit by a >>>> fixie poseur who was making a right turn on red without stopping or >>>> yielding. >>> Car drivers do that a lot. I guess he was >>> a car driver on a bike. There are all too >>> many of those. >>> >> The guy is lucky he avoided me, since he would likely have landed on his >> face. Hitting a pedestrian while riding an upright usually is much worse >> for the rider. > > It's bad all around. > I will take my chances as a pedestrian, thank you. >>>> Notice that none of these incidents involve the dreaded steel and glass >>>> cage. >>> I notice that you lived to tell the tale. >>> >> The one incident with an upright involved several children running out >> in front of me while being screened from view by a parked vehicle. I was >> able to slow to less than 15 mph before the collision with an estimated >> 70 pound child (I probably weighed about 105 pounds at the time). The >> result was a nasty scalp wound for me, a bent fork on my Peugeot, and a >> minor scratch on the idiotic child's knee. >> >> Had I been riding a proper recumbent, the outcome would have been much >> more in my favor. > > How so? Would there have been less hurtin' of people > all around? > Yes. I would have landed on my side instead of my head. Experience indicates that the former is much less damaging. >>> I guess you're sharp enough to survive all >>> these dreaded onslaughts. >>> >> Hey, if a moron on a bike wants to run into me when I am a pedestrian >> and have the right-of-way, I will lead with my shoulder. > > If you say so. > Again, why reward the anti-social for their behavior? >>> Heck, I survive & thrive well enough with >>> my ~normal~ bikes. >>> >>> I don't need to look to other configs >>> to make-up for my judgmental mistakes. >>> >> How is having others violate one's right-of-way a judgmental mistake? > > The decision to retaliate is always a mistake. > I (obviously) neither wrote or implied anything about retaliation. Why should I be obstructed by the behavior of the anti-social? > Try not to retaliate. That just emits more bad vibes > into the world. There are usually more artful solutions > than BF&I. Often the solution is the realization that one > is one of many mistake-prone people. > Again, where does this idea of retaliation come from? I wrote nothing of the sort. Does Mr. Keats have an ax to grind here? > This world needs more good vibes. Let's make 'em. > Lead 'em in with your shoulder & your heart & your > pedal-pumpin'. > > And screw ego. > What is the thread pitch and diameter of ego? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|