![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 1:11 pm, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> John, I'm not sure I'm following you. You say you were born on a US > Army base in the US. But, were you the child of citizens of some > other country? I only ask because if your parents were US citizens, > then the fact that you were born on an Army base is irrelevant. If > you're a citizen, you're a citizen. They can't make YOU leave no > matter what your wife's status is, and your children are citizens, > too, so long as YOU are a citizen, assuming they were born in the US. I think the original army base comment was just John trying to emphasize his patriotic bona fides. Of course they can't deport him. And if he's a citizen, his children are citizens, whether they were born in the US or not. But what does that matter if they deport his wife? In today's society, it's not considered normal to just wave goodbye to your wife or mother as she's deported, so as a practical matter he and the kids would have to try to emigrate to Canadia. > Of course, you could just tell 'em you messed up in the original > application and your wife is actually Mexican. Dream on. If you and your friends haven't had to deal with the walking screwup that is ICE, be happy. They are entirely capable of penalizing you for trying to do the right thing. Ben |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 3:23*pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
wrote: > I think the original army base comment was just > John trying to emphasize his patriotic bona fides. You are probably correct. Can you post a link to the www.schwartzsoft.com page where you are getting all these interpreters? Both myself and Amit could use them. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 3:23 pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
wrote: > And if he's a > citizen, his children are citizens, whether they > were born in the US or not. This is not true. If a child was born outside of the US then the father's marital status at the time of the child's birth, and his residency status prior to the birth, determines whether the child is a US citizen. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 8:54 pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 3:23 pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org> > wrote: > > > And if he's a > > citizen, his children are citizens, whether they > > were born in the US or not. > > This is not true. If a child was born outside of the US then the > father's marital status at the time of the child's birth, and his > residency status prior to the birth, determines whether the child is a > US citizen. The bottom line is, Bickmore needs both a lawyer and some leverage, and I'm not sure he's going to find either one here in rbr. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 8:54*pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 3:23 pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org> > wrote: > > > And if he's a > > citizen, his children are citizens, whether they > > were born in the US or not. > > This is not true. If a child was born outside of the US then the > father's marital status at the time of the child's birth, and his > residency status prior to the birth, determines whether the child is a > US citizen. You are correct that I assumed too much. On reading the current law (since 1986) it appears that it depends on how many years the U.S. citizen parent has lived in the U.S. before the child's birth (I suspect that Bickmore meets the requirement). I didn't see where marital status entered into it, but you're likely much more familiar with this law than I am. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/...1----000-..html I agree that he needs expert intervention which RBR doesn't provide, although there has been some decent advice in the thread. Ben |
|