![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have something of an awkward dilemma.
A few weeks ago I bought a Genesis Skyline on my firm's Cycle2Work scheme. Unfortunately, the scheme is set up through Halfords, so I had to order the bike through them. Anyway, on getting the bike home I discovered a relatively large dent in the top tube. Obviously it was rather embarrassing to return a bike as dented after I'd already ridden it, but Halfords were extremely good about it, readily agreed that the lack of any scratches clearly showed this was an injury sustained in the factory, and arranged for a replacement bike. I've ridden the replacement about 3 times. Then today I had to stop suddenly after a pedestrian stepped out in front of the car in front of me. I didn't come off the bike, but it reared up and came down a little awkwardly. End result: very slight bend in the front wheel and a rear wheel that needs to be completely rebuilt (surprisingly, given the rather light nature of the fall). My problem is this: after taking a look at the rear wheel my LBS consider the spokes to be far too tight and suggest returning the bike under warranty. I'm not sure if I have the nerve to return a second bike with a pair of bent wheels and demand they be replaced. Could the spokes have become tight when the wheel bent? Is it unreasonable to expect a replacement? P.S. Chap in the car in front was a true gent. I brushed his car with my bike (came to a stop as we touched - no real impact) and he was totally unconcerned - just worried I might be hurt (I and his car were both fine). |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 28 Apr, 11:17, thwey...@googlemail.com wrote:
> *Is it unreasonable to expect a replacement? Not at all. The design of the bike is clearly not good enough to withstand what one would imagine would be a "normal" procedure i.e. an emergency stop. You need a different model bike as much as the replacement. ian |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thweylan writtificated
> I didn't come off the bike, but it reared up and came down a > little awkwardly. End result: very slight bend in the front wheel and > a rear wheel that needs to be completely rebuilt (surprisingly, given > the rather light nature of the fall). I can't imagine a properly put together pair of wheels failing like this. Definately take 'em back and get 'em replaced or fixed. Are they just out of true or is the rim dented? > P.S. Chap in the car in front was a true gent [...] just worried I might > be hurt You know it was a cyclist behind the wheel when the driver leaps out to check he's not damaged your bike. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thweylan@googlemail.com wrote:
> My problem is this: after taking a look at the rear wheel my LBS > consider the spokes to be far too tight and suggest returning the bike > under warranty. I'm not sure if I have the nerve to return a second > bike with a pair of bent wheels and demand they be replaced. Could > the spokes have become tight when the wheel bent? No. > Is it unreasonable to expect a replacement? It would be reasonable to expect the wheel to be retensioned or replaced if the spokes were so tight that it was already near to the point of collapse. This is certainly possible. It is also possible that your LBS is wrong in thinking the spokes are too tight (some bike shops never tension highly enough). But if you don't have a good reason to doubt them, you could take advantage and use their verdict as an expert report if you get it in writng - which may help in any dispute. ~PB |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mark T
<pleasegivegenerously@warmail*turn_up_the_heat_to_reply*.com.invalid> wrote: > thweylan writtificated > > > I didn't come off the bike, but it reared up and came down a > > little awkwardly. End result: very slight bend in the front wheel and > > a rear wheel that needs to be completely rebuilt (surprisingly, given > > the rather light nature of the fall). > > I can't imagine a properly put together pair of wheels failing like this. > Definately take 'em back and get 'em replaced or fixed. > > Are they just out of true or is the rim dented? > > > P.S. Chap in the car in front was a true gent [...] just worried I might > > be hurt > > You know it was a cyclist behind the wheel when the driver leaps out to > check he's not damaged your bike. Ahem: the driver was in front. The driver will surely therefore have leapt out to check that the cyclist had not damaged their own bike. Cheers, Luke -- Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk> |
|