![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Apologies if already posted but I hadn't seen it.
Link to a web site showing entrants and winners of a 2008 International Bicycle Design competition. http://tps.tbnet.org.tw/mipis/desig...enu=1411&page=1 Lots of "eh?" and "why?" from me but interesting all the same (maybe others see more potentional in some of it). I'm no mechanical engineer but some of the designs seem highly optimistic in terms of ability to work and / or manufacture. Still it's good to see so much thought going into cycle innovation - regardless of how bonkers some of the proposals! I was actually following a link from this http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/0...n-catches-rays/ but couldn't then find it on the site but then the web site is very clunky - I guess they spend more time on bicycle rather than web design. Matt |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <sFWQj.16186$244.12039@newsfe1-win.ntli.net>, Matt
m@email.com says... > Apologies if already posted but I hadn't seen it. > > Link to a web site showing entrants and winners of a 2008 International > Bicycle Design competition. > > http://tps.tbnet.org.tw/mipis/desig...enu=1411&page=1 > > Lots of "eh?" and "why?" from me but interesting all the same (maybe others > see more potentional in some of it). I'm no mechanical engineer but some of > the designs seem highly optimistic in terms of ability to work and / or > manufacture. > > Still it's good to see so much thought going into cycle innovation - > regardless of how bonkers some of the proposals! > Judging by the previous award-winners that I skimmed through (slow site and I lost patience) the competition seems to concentrate on original ideas rather than practicality. In a way that's understandable because most of the more workable entries are rehashes of Edwardian designs, chunky plastic bikes, flimsy folders or exercises in graphic design that add superfluous bits which don't enhance functionality. There are a few nice ideas for toys mixed in with the dross, but most of the stuff is definitely below the standard of that sideways-bike thing that Michael Killian has been trying to promote for years. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Matt" <m@email.com> wrote in message news:sFWQj.16186$244.12039@newsfe1-win.ntli.net... > Apologies if already posted but I hadn't seen it. > > Link to a web site showing entrants and winners of a 2008 International > Bicycle Design competition. > > http://tps.tbnet.org.tw/mipis/desig...enu=1411&page=1 > > Lots of "eh?" and "why?" from me but interesting all the same (maybe > others see more potentional in some of it). I'm no mechanical engineer > but some of the designs seem highly optimistic in terms of ability to work > and / or manufacture. There have been quite a few ideas which have won awards etc. despite being impossible to produce without rewriting the laws of physics ridiculed on the Dans Data blog lately. I think most design competitions revolve around what looks nice as opposed to what might actually work well... |
|