Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing > rec.bicycles.racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Hypothetical dinner party

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27-04.-2008, 11:37 AM   #1
ronaldo_jeremiah
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hypothetical dinner party

You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following
four people to attend in person. Assume they will accept your
invitation, and will stay for at least three hours. You may invite
any other guests as you see fit, so long as you invite two from this
list:

Fat Stevie
Kunich
marika
Sierraman

Whom do you choose, and why?

Bonus: What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use,
or administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?

-rj
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 12:13 PM   #2
Kurgan Gringioni
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

On Apr 26, 7:37*pm, ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following
> four people to attend in person. *Assume they will accept your
> invitation, and will stay for at least three hours. *You may invite
> any other guests as you see fit, so long as you invite two from this
> list:
>
> Fat Stevie
> Kunich
> marika
> Sierraman
>
> Whom do you choose, and why?
>
> Bonus: *What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use,
> or administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?




Dumbass -


For question #2: cocaine and alcohol. Liberal amounts of both. Opium
dipped hash for people who don't swing for the white stuff.

Question #1: Sierraman would be OK if there weren't any women there.
Fat Steve would be OK if there were hot women and he would be so
intimated that he would be silent. Marika? too weird. No invite for
him/her. And Kunich? That's a no-go. 10 minutes of <insert rant here>
and the party would be empty.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 12:14 PM   #3
Howard Kveck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

In article <6896a0d1-4b5c-445d-a4ad-2645143e1d81@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com> wrote:

> You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following
> four people to attend in person. Assume they will accept your
> invitation, and will stay for at least three hours. You may invite
> any other guests as you see fit, so long as you invite two from this
> list:
>
> Fat Stevie
> Kunich
> marika
> Sierraman
>
> Whom do you choose, and why?
>
> Bonus: What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use,
> or administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?


Good god... Only if use of these were mandatory (marika being the exception):

http://tinyurl.com/4gpoya

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 01:40 PM   #4
Michael Press
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

In article
<6896a0d1-4b5c-445d-a4ad-2645143e1d81@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com> wrote:

> You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following
> four people to attend in person. Assume they will accept your
> invitation, and will stay for at least three hours. You may invite
> any other guests as you see fit, so long as you invite two from this
> list:
>
> Fat Stevie
> Kunich
> marika
> Sierraman
>
> Whom do you choose, and why?
>
> Bonus: What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use,
> or administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?


marika and Tom Kunich.

Why? It would take me several paragraphs.
marika thinks things through and is funny with it.
Tom Kunich might surprise you.
Fat Stevie is more open than many seem to think.
I am the psychoactive substance.

--
Michael Press
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 02:50 PM   #5
Kurgan Gringioni
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

On Apr 26, 9:40*pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <6896a0d1-4b5c-445d-a4ad-2645143e1...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> *ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following
> > four people to attend in person. *Assume they will accept your
> > invitation, and will stay for at least three hours. *You may invite
> > any other guests as you see fit, so long as you invite two from this
> > list:

>
> > Fat Stevie
> > Kunich
> > marika
> > Sierraman

>
> > Whom do you choose, and why?

>
> > Bonus: *What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use,
> > or administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?

>
> marika and Tom Kunich.
>
> Why? It would take me several paragraphs.
> marika thinks things through and is funny with it.
> Tom Kunich might surprise you.
> Fat Stevie is more open than many seem to think.
> I am the psychoactive substance.





Dumbass -


Ya, it'd be fun to have Fat Steve around. One of the wonderful things
about him is that after all these years he's still trying to convince
a bike racing community that he's not fat.

Gotta love the Megafauna! Here is my favorite Megafauna story:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23595533/


\thanks,

K. Gringioni.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 03:07 PM   #6
Bret
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

On Apr 26, 8:37*pm, ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following
> four people to attend in person. *Assume they will accept your
> invitation, and will stay for at least three hours. *You may invite
> any other guests as you see fit, so long as you invite two from this
> list:
>
> Fat Stevie
> Kunich
> marika
> Sierraman
>
> Whom do you choose, and why?
>
> Bonus: *What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use,
> or administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?
>
> -rj


I would invite marika and Fat Stevie, but I wouldn't give Stevie the
right directions.

Bret
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 03:40 PM   #7
Donald Munro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

ronaldo_jeremiah wrote:

> You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following four
> people to attend in person. Assume they will accept your invitation, and
> will stay for at least three hours. You may invite any other guests as
> you see fit, so long as you invite two from this list:
>
> Fat Stevie
> Kunich
> marika
> Sierraman
> Bonus: What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use, or
> administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?


It might get a bit AWKward if marika was there. And having Kunich and
marika there would be like casting perls before the swine.

I hope this thread isn't going to snobol out of control.


  Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 04:18 PM   #8
Ted van de Weteringe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23595533/


"Authorities said they did not know if she was mentally or physically
disabled."

....
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-04.-2008, 03:31 AM   #9
dave a
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

Donald Munro wrote:
> ronaldo_jeremiah wrote:
>
>> You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following four
>> people to attend in person. Assume they will accept your invitation, and
>> will stay for at least three hours. You may invite any other guests as
>> you see fit, so long as you invite two from this list:
>>
>> Fat Stevie
>> Kunich
>> marika
>> Sierraman
>> Bonus: What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use, or
>> administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?

>
> It might get a bit AWKward if marika was there. And having Kunich and
> marika there would be like casting perls before the swine.
>
> I hope this thread isn't going to snobol out of control.
>
>


Does Fat Steve speak with a LISP?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-04.-2008, 04:40 AM   #10
Cracker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hypothetical dinner party

His step-mother's name is Ethyl Thayer. Does that anwer your question?


"dave a" <blkcatREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fv2grd02qta@news5.newsguy.com...
> Donald Munro wrote:
>> ronaldo_jeremiah wrote:
>>
>>> You are having a dinner party, and *must* invite two of the following
>>> four
>>> people to attend in person. Assume they will accept your invitation,
>>> and
>>> will stay for at least three hours. You may invite any other guests as
>>> you see fit, so long as you invite two from this list:
>>>
>>> Fat Stevie
>>> Kunich
>>> marika
>>> Sierraman
>>> Bonus: What specific psychoactive substances will you yourself use, or
>>> administer to your guests, in order to endure the dinner party?

>>
>> It might get a bit AWKward if marika was there. And having Kunich and
>> marika there would be like casting perls before the swine. I hope this
>> thread isn't going to snobol out of control.
>>
>>

>
> Does Fat Steve speak with a LISP?



  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com