![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all
I've Googled for this and found that the link has a right way round but it doesn't say which way. When fitted the link has one side forward of the other. Does the forward side go against the adjacent sprocket or away from it? The instruction sheet shows the forward side against the sprocket but doesn't specify which way round to fit it. Tried it like this last night and got some skipping. Have turned it round and adjusted the indexing but haven't had time to try it yet. Chain and cassette are new. Ken. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi all > > I've Googled for this and found that the link has a right way round > but it doesn't say which way. > > When fitted the link has one side forward of the other. Does the > forward side go against the adjacent sprocket or away from it? The > instruction sheet shows the forward side against the sprocket but > doesn't specify which way round to fit it. Tried it like this last > night and got some skipping. Have turned it round and adjusted the > indexing but haven't had time to try it yet. Chain and cassette are > new. It doesn't matter for sprockets larger than 12 teeth. Sorry I can't remember which way round it needs to be otherwise. ~PB (13-29) |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Pete Biggs" <p@pomegranateremovehighlyimpracticalfruitbiggs.tc> wrote in
message news:67c7afF2oh172U1@mid.individual.net... > Ken wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I've Googled for this and found that the link has a right way round >> but it doesn't say which way. It doesn't matter for sprockets larger than 12 teeth. > > Sorry I can't remember which way round it needs to be otherwise. > > ~PB (13-29) I found my Wipperman Connex would skip on the 11 tooth cog (and the 12 under heavy load) if I had it on the wrong way. The correct way (as I found out by trial and error) is to look at the banana shaped hole in the link and have the curve of the banana facing towards the cogs. I have had no problems since doing this. Cheers Jim J |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 24 Apr, 21:30, "Jim" <do...@reply.no> wrote:
> I found my Wipperman Connex would skip on the 11 tooth cog (and the 12 under > heavy load) if I had it on the wrong way. > The correct way (as I found out by trial and error) is to look at the banana > shaped hole in the link and have the curve of the banana facing towards the > cogs. I have had no problems since doing this. Me likewise, although I never really liked the chain (808) so went back to SRAM, which felt much smoother. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Ken" <kenneth.clements@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:9x3Qj.105197$5i5.9179@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net... > Hi all > > I've Googled for this and found that the link has a right way round but it > doesn't say which way. > > When fitted the link has one side forward of the other. Does the forward > side go against the adjacent sprocket or away from it? The instruction > sheet shows the forward side against the sprocket but doesn't specify > which way round to fit it. Tried it like this last night and got some > skipping. Have turned it round and adjusted the indexing but haven't had > time to try it yet. Chain and cassette are new. > > Ken. Solved. When on the inside of the chain the long end should trail. No more skipping on 11 tooth sprocket. Ken. |
|