Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


PowerTap Pro Cadence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25-04.-2008, 01:25 AM   #1
BtonRider
Registered User
 
BtonRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 113
Question PowerTap Pro Cadence

I just purchased the PowerTap a month ago and I've been using the additional Cadence sensor. I noticed it has a built in feature where it analyzes the pulsations in the hub to determine the cadence. Has anyone used the built in feature before? I'm wondering how reliable it is. I wouldn't mind shaving off a few extra grams from the total weight of the PowerTap set up, but only if I can trust the numbers.
BtonRider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-04.-2008, 01:35 AM   #2
daveryanwyoming
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,386
Default Re: PowerTap Pro Cadence

Quote:
Originally Posted by BtonRider
I just purchased the PowerTap a month ago and I've been using the additional Cadence sensor. I noticed it has a built in feature where it analyzes the pulsations in the hub to determine the cadence. Has anyone used the built in feature before? I'm wondering how reliable it is. I wouldn't mind shaving off a few extra grams from the total weight of the PowerTap set up, but only if I can trust the numbers.
When I built up a new road bike last fall I didn't bother mounting the optional PT cadence sensor and have been running it on derived hub cadence ever since. My TT bike and older road bike both use the crank based cadence sensor. The values from both systems seem accurate, hard to know for sure as you measure one or the other at a given time but I don't get cadence drop outs or unrealistic high or low cadence values. Hub based cadence might be a bit jumpier when I look at downloaded files in WKO+ but I use a bit of display averaging and it all seems fine. I guess the related question is how much accuracy do you really need in cadence readings? Will you alter your training or racing if a particular section showed 88 rpm when you really wanted 90 rpm?

-Dave
daveryanwyoming is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-04.-2008, 02:00 AM   #3
strader
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Default Re: PowerTap Pro Cadence

I tried using the calculated cadence and found it very inaccurate. When pedalling at 110+ rpms it would report about half that (~60rpms).
strader is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-04.-2008, 02:20 AM   #4
BtonRider
Registered User
 
BtonRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 113
Default Re: PowerTap Pro Cadence

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveryanwyoming
I guess the related question is how much accuracy do you really need in cadence readings? Will you alter your training or racing if a particular section showed 88 rpm when you really wanted 90 rpm?

True enough. I would just like to be sure it's not off by 20rpm.
BtonRider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-04.-2008, 02:20 AM   #5
BtonRider
Registered User
 
BtonRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 113
Default Re: PowerTap Pro Cadence

Quote:
Originally Posted by strader
I tried using the calculated cadence and found it very inaccurate. When pedalling at 110+ rpms it would report about half that (~60rpms).
Yikes! Was it more reasonable at lower cadence?
BtonRider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-04.-2008, 05:27 AM   #6
flanman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
Default Re: PowerTap Pro Cadence

The hub-based cadence works ok, with a few flaws.

It cannot read above about 140 rpm. Don't trust any readings above 120 rpm. This isn't a big issue, but if you're training for track or sprinting then it's better to use the cadence sensor.

rpm for one legged pedalling will be off.

Due, I think, to aliasing, there are some values that it never reads. For instance, it may read 93 or 95 rpm but never 94. There are data holes every 12 rpm or so. This is a minor inconvenience. Set cadence averaging to 3 or 5 seconds and you'll never notice it.

In short, hub cadence sensing is usally good enough for most riders' needs. Be aware of its limitations though.
flanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-04.-2008, 09:40 AM   #7
RChung
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 192
Default Re: PowerTap Pro Cadence

Quote:
Originally Posted by BtonRider
but only if I can trust the numbers.
Depends on what you want to do with the cadence numbers but for most purposes it's a red herring. You have a power meter. Focus on power.
RChung is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-04.-2008, 10:17 AM   #8
strader
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Default Re: PowerTap Pro Cadence

Quote:
Originally Posted by BtonRider
Yikes! Was it more reasonable at lower cadence?

Yeah, it seemed fine at low cadences. I think for anything higher than ~95 rpm it would read only half the pedal strokes.
strader is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet