Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
21-04.-2008, 01:20 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
|
USAC regulations
Based on personal experiences, how stringent are officials at USAC-sanctioned events (individual time trial) RE: saddle setback and bottom bracket relationships? Talking about CAT 5 level. My saddle tip sits dead center over the center of the bottom bracket, clearly not the 5cm as stated in the manual. I know the ultimate remedy is to downsize the frame--however, when I was fitted to the bike (specifically for ITT), it seems everyone forgot about the saddle tip/bottom bracket rule.
Thanks |
|
|
|
21-04.-2008, 02:00 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,311
|
Re: USAC regulations
Quote:
-Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
22-04.-2008, 06:22 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
|
Re: USAC regulations
Thanks. I assumed as much, but just some concern. RE: the thomson setback, I actually have the saddle rails forward (effective seatpost angle 79.5) to get into the cockpit--the stem has been shortened to help. I'm trying to work around a frame that is one size too big (I think, based on the mods that we've done). Ummm...barring these technical issues of saddle/rails forward with a shortened stem, it seems to fit (or at least its a tolerable aero position, if only for a while).
Thanks again. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
