Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Tubeless for Less

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-04.-2008, 09:19 AM   #1
bigpedaler
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 209
Default Tubeless for Less

I've wondered about this for some time; a racer friend of mine, among other sources, convinced me to try tubeless on my mtn. bike. I bought a Stan's kit, with the rim strips and solution, and hooked up a set of Hutch Scorpion UST's with the Mavic 223 rims. The system worked perfectly, and I immediately noticed the increased performance. When the Scorps wore out, I got a smokin' deal on some non-UST Spiders, some 200g lighter and a sweet tread pattern. But no matter what we both did, the Spiders wouldn't seal up. So I installed tubes, and ran it that way ever since.

Here's the trick; during our efforts to air up the Spiders, my bud told me about the non-UST Mythos tires he was running, and how they needed about half a bottle of Stan's to seal the porous sidewalls. I had the brainstorm of sealing the sidewalls with regular fix-a-flat. Since the deal I got on the Spiders was a bulk purchase, I had other tires -- all of which were sealed up with the fix-a-flat. I have since noticed that the f-a-f treatment reduces tube friction inside the standard tire, too.

Last week, my bud got a new set of Mythos for his bike, and decided to try the f-a-f in one tire vs. the Stan's in the other. He wound up doing both tires with the f-a-f! He tells me it's twice as messy to set up, but it works perfectly!

Has anyone else thought of this, or tried it? Anyone else willing to try it? I'm likely to, when my next tire change rolls around.
__________________
"you may only be one person in the world -- but you may just be THE WORLD to one person."
bigpedaler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04.-2008, 09:39 PM   #2
dgregory57
Registered User
 
dgregory57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 634
Default Re: Tubeless for Less

I haven't tried yet, but I may try tubeless in the future...

How much money is saved to make up for the extra mess of using FAF?
__________________
dgregory57 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-04.-2008, 01:07 PM   #3
bigpedaler
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 209
Default Re: Tubeless for Less

16oz. Stans -- $14.00+

16oz. FAF -- $3-4
__________________
"you may only be one person in the world -- but you may just be THE WORLD to one person."
bigpedaler is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet