Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Recumbent bicycles > alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Re: Jim McNamara and Ed Gin - together again!

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-04.-2008, 09:14 AM   #1
Tom Sherman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jim McNamara and Ed Gin - together again!

JimmyMac aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> [...]
> We just ventured in the the realm of beastiality and necrophilia here
> and I suspect Ed's fallacious extension of the definition of a
> homosexual would be objected to by a homosexual who by definition is
> attracted to live members of his or her own gender. I thought even Ed
> knew this. He really ought to get out more.[...]


Is that really a good idea? Think of the innocent!

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04.-2008, 10:29 AM   #2
Tom Sherman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jim McNamara and Ed Gin - together again!

Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ftjm4k$k7d$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> JimmyMac aka Jim McNamara wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> We just ventured in the the realm of beastiality and necrophilia here
>>> and I suspect Ed's fallacious extension of the definition of a
>>> homosexual would be objected to by a homosexual who by definition is
>>> attracted to live members of his or her own gender. I thought even Ed
>>> knew this. He really ought to get out more.[...]

>> Is that really a good idea? Think of the innocent!

>
> Homos are NOT born that way. They CHOOSE to be homo. It is on that basis
> that they can so easily be condemned for the wretched bastards that they
> are. Did you know that Iran has no homos, according to their president? That
> is because they have the good sense to execute them wherever they are found.
>

Do I have to explain the joke?

> We all must ask ourselves what the Spanish Inquisition would do about it and
> then go and do likewise.
>

The Spanish Inquisition would poke them with soft cushions with the
stuffing up one end, then make them sit in The Comfy Chair till lunch
time, with only a cup of coffee at eleven, while shouting "Confess!
Confess! Confess!".

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04.-2008, 12:53 AM   #3
JimmyMac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jim McNamara and Ed Gin - together again!

On Apr 9, 7:14 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com>
wrote:
> JimmyMac aka Jim McNamara wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > We just ventured in the the realm of beastiality and necrophilia here
> > and I suspect Ed's fallacious extension of the definition of a
> > homosexual would be objected to by a homosexual who by definition is
> > attracted to live members of his or her own gender. I thought even Ed
> > knew this. He really ought to get out more.[...]

>
> Is that really a good idea? Think of the innocent!


Yeah, I here you on that account ... point well taken. There is no
danger anyways, being walled up in his sanctum, safe from real-world
contact with real people. Imagine how frightening Dolan must find the
prospect of facing reality.

> --
> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
> The weather is here, wish you were beautiful


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04.-2008, 11:01 AM   #4
Tom Sherman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jim McNamara and Ed Gin - together again!

Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ftjqi7$8mk$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ftjm4k$k7d$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> JimmyMac aka Jim McNamara wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> We just ventured in the the realm of beastiality and necrophilia here
>>>>> and I suspect Ed's fallacious extension of the definition of a
>>>>> homosexual would be objected to by a homosexual who by definition is
>>>>> attracted to live members of his or her own gender. I thought even Ed
>>>>> knew this. He really ought to get out more.[...]
>>>> Is that really a good idea? Think of the innocent!
>>> Homos are NOT born that way. They CHOOSE to be homo. It is on that basis
>>> that they can so easily be condemned for the wretched bastards that they
>>> are. Did you know that Iran has no homos, according to their president?
>>> That is because they have the good sense to execute them wherever they
>>> are found.
>>>

>> Do I have to explain the joke?

>
> Tom Sherman probably thinks that criminals are born criminals too whereas of
> course the fact is that every criminal CHOSE to be a criminal. The best
> solution to all of these problems is to execute them forthwith. I think a
> firing squad works best, you know ... like how they did it in "The Treasure
> of the Sierra Madre".
> [...]
>

W H O O O O S H !

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com