Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


FTP v LT v AT

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-04.-2008, 06:29 AM   #1
Phil S
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
Default FTP v LT v AT

Hi, a message for the power geeks. I have measurements for myself for LT and AT done at Loughborough Uni. I was wondering whether FTP is a completely separate number or could I deduce it from my test results, or do I have to go and determine FTP by the method described on Training Peaks? Am a new Powertap user and have no data files.
Phil S is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04.-2008, 07:00 AM   #2
Piotr
Registered User
 
Piotr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Draper, Utah
Posts: 523
Default Re: FTP v LT v AT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil S
Hi, a message for the power geeks. I have measurements for myself for LT and AT done at Loughborough Uni. I was wondering whether FTP is a completely separate number or could I deduce it from my test results, or do I have to go and determine FTP by the method described on Training Peaks? Am a new Powertap user and have no data files.
It's related, but different. For best results you need to do an FTP test.

http://www.cyclingforums.com/t439028.html
__________________
blog

Last edited by Piotr : 09-04.-2008 at 07:06 AM. Reason: added link
Piotr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04.-2008, 08:21 AM   #3
daveryanwyoming
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,506
Default Re: FTP v LT v AT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotr
It's related, but different. For best results you need to do an FTP test.

http://www.cyclingforums.com/t439028.html
Yup, similar but slightly different reference points. Technically power at LT should be a bit lower than FTP and AT is a pretty dated term which really doesn't exist. There is no "threshold" between aerobic and anaerobic metabolisms and the term AT has fallen into disfavor as it falsely implies a precise transition. I suspect the power they told you represents AT is pretty close to your FTP. Easy enough to find out, get a good warmup on a day when you're fresh and motivated and see how long you can hold that power. If you get a solid half hour to hour it's a pretty good starting point to estimate your FTP. If you easily go beyond an hour at that power then your FTP is higher.

Regardless of the testing method you chose you'll refine your FTP estimate with more training, it's pretty normal to adjust your early FTP estimates upwards as you get used to pacing steady long efforts and start to reap the benefits of focused training.

Good luck,
-Dave
daveryanwyoming is online now  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet