![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, AU.
Posts: 10
|
I installed a luggage rack on my Trek 1.5 (Bontrager carbon seat post) - the type that cantilevers off of the seat post.
I commuted to work for a week, 45 mins each way, with my bag weighing 6 kg (the weight limit of the rack was 10kg) A week later I hear some cracking around the bike and discover that the seat post was cracking around where it fits into the frame (picture attached) So what is the deal? Your opinions? Does the fact that I fitted the part out of the factory mean that I may not be able to claim under manufacturer's warranty Hell, I'm just glad that the post didn't crack. I am a fairly heavy rider, but I only noticed the cracking in the last week - and I had removed the post to fit the rack and did not notice any cracking. I torqued the bolt up nip tight What are your thoughts? I would definitely recommend against using this type of luggage rack. The shop I bought it at recommended this type since, in the opinion of the sales rep, the frame would be too weak to accomodate the other type.
__________________
Trek 1.5 - 64cm (I think its a bit small!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, AU.
Posts: 10
|
bump - too many ads
__________________
Trek 1.5 - 64cm (I think its a bit small!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 574
|
Quote:
My thoughts are it's not a rack problem but attaching it to a carbon seatpost problem. Get an aluminum one and use it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,268
|
I don't think putting one of those seat post racks is ever recommended on a carbon post..... but - if you took your seatpost out and put it back in you may have overtightened the collar when you reinstalled it. Did you use a torque wrench? Carbon can be cracked if you are overly zealous..... (and 5-6nm, though more than finger tight is not cranked down as hard as a big guy can muster)
I would bet that both the added weight of your rack and stuff, plus overtightening your seatpost collar both contributed to its demise. Like Peter said - if you want to use that kind of rack get an aluminium seat post (and buy a torque wrench - you can still ruin a metal post if you crank down too hard on it!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 3,362
|
I second what Eden says. I think that you overtightened the installation and that is the main cause of your problem. Get a strong alu post, install as per spec and you should not have any troubles.
__________________
De Rosa Planet Campagnolo Per Sempre! PAOLO BETTINI CAMPIONE DEL MONDO x 2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, AU.
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Any ideas how to measure the torque applied to the allen key fitting (as it is on my bike) for the seat post - the required torque is 9 Nm - I have a cheap auto torque wrench but that is designed to measure much larger torques - hence I do not trust its accuracy at the low numbers... What do you guys use?
__________________
Trek 1.5 - 64cm (I think its a bit small!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
As for the post, I agree with all the others. Being one that bought a carbon post in a moment of weakness, I feel I can state with authority that the carbon post saves little if any weight and does not add to comfort over a good quality (and much cheaper) aluminum post. PS: if you're clever and know how to calculate inch-lbs (or the metric equivalent), you can fairly accurately torque with a digital fish scale pulling on a measured length. I did that and it was within tolerance when I re-checked with a torque wrench. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Western Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,533
|
A decent torque wrench is not that expensive. The dial torque wrenches are but the micrometer handle torque wrenches are fairly accurate and are not expensive at all. I wouldn't trust a deflecting beam torque wrench on a $1500 and up bicycle. If you are going to spend that much on a CF frame bike though, you can afford a good torque wrench as insurance.
__________________
One life, one chance. Don't waste it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, AU.
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Well I just got back from the LBS - picked up an Al fork for AUD $50.00 to give me some confidence in riding with the luggage rack - which I'm assured will be pretty safe. What is a fish scale? I thought of using a spring-type scale, but if I couldnt apply the force at 90deg I cannot be bothered doing the calculations - I hate being at work at home! Get this though - I asked the LBS and they do it by 'feel' - Far out, what a dodgy LBS. Not taking my bike there. They did make a very good suggestion about upgrading my wheels frmo Bontrager select to race -I will do this soon, should be good. Thanks all.
__________________
Trek 1.5 - 64cm (I think its a bit small!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, AU.
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
PS now that I have an Al post I can torque up all I want? (within reason) -correct?
__________________
Trek 1.5 - 64cm (I think its a bit small!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,165
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, AU.
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
__________________
Trek 1.5 - 64cm (I think its a bit small!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 3,362
|
Crank it tight enough that the seat post does not slip. No need to give it the torque of death routine...
FYI, a decent low range torque wrench can be had for something in the range of 90~100 Euro (IIRC) here in the Old World. Syntace makes quite a nice one, if you are in the market...
__________________
De Rosa Planet Campagnolo Per Sempre! PAOLO BETTINI CAMPIONE DEL MONDO x 2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 115
|
I have a Topeak rack on my Trek with a aluminum seatpost and no problems. In fact I constantly put twice the recommended wieght on it. Bungeed a milk crate to make it really useful. Mine attaches to the seatpost via quick release, same as the seatpost to the frame.
|
|
|
|