Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
15-03.-2008, 02:57 PM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
New take on old test
Not sure if it's been on here before, but I quite like this new take
on the old observation test - http://www.dothetest.co.uk/ Graeme |
|
|
18-03.-2008, 09:57 AM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: New take on old test
On Mar 15, 1:57 pm, Graeme Dods <GraemeD...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.dothetest.co.uk/ I got it right first time. Those of us with bandwidth quotas have a bit of an advantage here... |
|
|
|
18-03.-2008, 10:14 AM
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: New take on old test
brucef wrote:
> On Mar 15, 1:57 pm, Graeme Dods <GraemeD...@gmail.com> wrote: >> http://www.dothetest.co.uk/ > > I got it right first time. Those of us with bandwidth quotas have a > bit of an advantage here... Wife and I both missed the bear. But my 8 y.o. daughter couldn't count the passes because the bear was distracting her.  DaveB |
|
|
Linear Mode
