![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
|
I posted a thread several weeks ago because I was unsure if I wanted to get a new bike or just change the crank. After reading the latest bicycling magazine I have decided to keep my bike and get a double crankset. I think it will just be easier to maintain and promote better shifting. I don't know if I should get a standard double or a compact crankset. I know a compact double is prefered by many but can I also get a standard double? Which would be better? My bike has Shimano parts (Tiagra/105). I would like to keep this upgrade under $75 and I don't want to change any of the other parts if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth (Basso), West Australia
Posts: 3,511
|
__________________
Cheers, George. Last edited by gclark8 : 27-02.-2008 at 04:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
You can put a double ring crank onto your bike w/o any other changes, even if you have triple derailleurs, BUT gearing and needed ratios is a personal choice. Either a standard or compact will work but the resulting gearing nobody can spec for you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,968
|
Quote:
Since you mentioned (in an earlier thread) that you "ride on mostly flat terrain" you really don't need a "compact" crank ... but, that doesn't meant that you shouldn't avoid one, either ... For cosmetic reasons, since you've currently got a triple -- and, because 'I' recommend the triple front derailleur & triple rear derailleur (with more chain capacity) when using a compact crank -- you may as well get a compact crank so it looks like an intentional setup! For practical reasons, it is nice to have a wider range of gears even if you are currently only riding on flat terrain ... at some point in the future, you may move to an area which has hills OR your rides may become longer (this does not apply to people who live in truly FLAT places like Florida) and take you to places that have hills, so a compact is often a better choice for non-competitive riders. If you factor in what you might get by re-selling the triple crank + BB on eBay, then that will give you a little more flexibility in your crank & BB choice ... so, your $75 can actually be closer to $100+ (you'll probably get more than $25 -- the extra money will pay for the installation tools), but you can certainly get a compact crank & BB for closer to $75 if you are a wise shopper. There ARE reasons to get/use a standard crank ... the practical reason is that 130BCD (the current ROAD standard) chainrings are readily available in all tooth counts & price ranges. 135BCD (Campagnolo) & 110BCD ("compact") chainrings are not as readily available, and consequently you normally have to pay more for replacements. The other reason to choose a standard crank is because the shifting is generally a little better BECAUSE the difference between the chainrings is smaller AND (in the past) the crank & rings were stiffer ... Cranks, chainrings & front derailleurs are generally MUCH better than in the distant past ... So, while a standard crank would be slightly better, Since you will probably be leaving the chain on the large ring most of the time, the slightly better shifting that a standard crank usually has probably wouldn't be missed if you got a compact crankset. BTW. Just for your reference, a bazillion years ago, the so-called "compact" crank was pejoratively-or-euphemistically (depending on who was saying it & to whom) referred as a crank with "Alpine gearing" ... but, the compact crank only became fashionable a few years ago AFTER Pinarello introduced one of their bikes with the Pinarello name stenciled on a compact crankset (thus, a literal imprimatur) & Tyler Hamilton won a Stage of the Tour de France using a compact crankset. Consequently, the stigma of having a compact crank no longer exists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Western Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,634
|
just getting post above spam
__________________
One life, one chance. Don't waste it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 90
|
Wait a minute - am I reading that right? I can buy an Ultegra compact double and it will work with my Ultegra 6500 triple setup? That is great news...
Do I have to swap bottom brackets to do that, even if I currently have an Ultegra BB? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
Ders don't really care, particularly the rear. As for BBs, the shimano compact is the outside bearing, 2 piece affair from. If you have a spline/Octalink type, you need a new BB. Lower FD, check chainlength, adjust FD, go ride. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,968
|
Quote:
If you don't immediately need/want a "compact" crank, you can just get a 109.5mm Octalink bottom bracket, remove the granny, re-mount, adjust the front derailleur stops ... FWIW. I have gravitated toward using 112.5 XTR Bottom Brackets with the various Shimano Octalink ROAD cranks as often as not ... with that length, I can use either a double or triple crank without changing the BB. Also, this should not be applicable to your GIANT OCR2 ... however (for the benefit of others who may have different frames & contemplating a similar conversion), on ONE bike which has an alloy frame (135mm rear spacing), I chose a 118mm ISIS bottom bracket to use with a ROAD double otherwise the large ring would have not cleared the chainstay. Similarly, with an alloy touring frame (again, 135mm rear spacing) that I had, I also needed a 118mm Octalink bottom bracket to allow me to use a ROAD triple/double. So, that's something people need to be aware of with regard to spindle length AND a minor (?) problem with cranks that use external BB cups because of the fixed spindle length. Quote:
BTW. Shimano has at least one, less expensive "compact" Hollowtech II crank, now, which is slightly heavier (solid arms) & 105-class chainrings. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
|
So, I have been looking at compact cranks but I still haven't ruled out standard cranks. With a triple I never feel like I use the granny ring, even all hills. Would I be safe then with going with a standard crank?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,968
|
Quote:
But, FWIW, it really seems that your best bet (i.e., most economical option -- a few minutes of your time & no money unless you don't have any tools) for the next couple of months is to simply adjust the front derailleur's inner stop so that you CANNOT shift onto the granny. Ride the bike like that until May-or-June/whenever, and then decide if you ever need the lower gear that the granny provides, a standard double crankset OR if you want a compact crankset ... Remove the granny if EITHER the appearance bothers you OR dead weight bother you. If life-without-the-granny works for you, then you can shop around for a new crank & BB combination OR simply buy a replacement BB with a shorter spindle (e.g., 109.5mm Octalink bottom bracket for an Octalink crankset, probably a 113mm for a square taper crankset), remove the granny (if it's still in place), remount the crank onto the new BB, and adjust the front derailleur's stops. Of course, you don't have to replace the BB! BTW. The thing about having a granny when you are using Shimano shifters is that you can dump onto the granny in the middle of a climb & upshift in the rear, accordingly, to compensate for the poor downshifting that Shimano's shifters exhibit when under load. Of course, if you never encounter any hills longer than 100 yards, then it probably doesn't matter as long as you select the right gear before the climb. |
|
|
|
|