![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
| View Poll Results: Which one would you choose?? | |||
| Avanti Giro |
|
0 | 0% |
| Giant Alliance Sport |
|
1 | 50.00% |
| Orbea Aspin |
|
1 | 50.00% |
| Orbea Enol |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 2. This poll is closed | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
|
OK guys and Gals,
This may be a no brainer for probably most of you, but I'm looking at buying my first real roadbike. Initially I was looking at the Orbea enol or aspin, but I wanted to check out the Giants (OCR! or OCR2) because a friend of mine has an OCR0. Then after chatting to another dealer I was introduced to the carbon composite frames (apparently these give a softer ride for the rougher roads, which is what is pretty common in these parts)of the Giant OCT Alliance sport then the Avanti Giro. Unfortunately they did not have a alliance big enough for me to have a ride on so I took the Giro for a spin. Well what a slick ride. Of course the Giro is $300 more than the alliance but runs the Shimano 105 compared to Tiagra on the alliance. Now comes the big question am I really better of spending the extra cabbage on the Giro, getting the better groupset (and are Avanti's any better or just as good as Giants?)? Or should I just stick with the full alluminium frame of the Orbeas?? At this point I have to confess that I only originally was going to fork out $1000 originally, now I won't be far off $2000 once I get all the other trimmings. All advice and Critisism is welcomed. |
|
|
|