![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 14
|
I have been doing a fair amount of indoor interval training the last few months. The focus of this training has been 2 days per week of varied L4 efforts (2x20' or 4x10') and 1 day of L5 efforts. The remaining days of the week are a hodge-podge of less intense workouts.
My question is this. My comfort level on the trainer is such that I prefer low cadence relatively speaking. Specifically, I settle in to a 65-70 rpm pace while generating the power necessary to stay in the respective level of the interval. My cadence outdoors is in the low 80s. Is the fact that my cadence is so low indoors adversely affecting my training? Put differently, will I realize more benefit from trying to match my cadence level inside to outside or does it matter? In sum, is a watt a watt or "what"? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 57
|
Watt is a Watt, you are certainly doing the work, however personally I would up the cadence a little to stress the cardiovascular system more and ease the stresses on joints and tendons.
Personally I never pedal slower than 105 RPM either indoors or outdoors and actually pedal slightly faster indoor (in ergo mode I find it easier that way). My cadence tends to be about 115 but I have been trying to reduce it down to 105 since I seem to be more efficient there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
So what will your events demand from you in terms of leg speed and acelerations? A lot of folks find they get more endurance by spinning easier gears and 65-70 rpm is pretty low as cadences go, but cadence is definitely secondary to power production. -Dave Last edited by daveryanwyoming : 18-01.-2008 at 09:03 AM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 14
|
Thanks for the replies. Wow! Root - I cannot imagine doing interval work at 105 rpm. The only time I hit that level is when I am doing indoor sprint training. Dave's comment makes a lot of sense. My goal is to do some crits (this is my first year racing) and I agree it would be hard - if not impossible - to accelerate from a low cadence/big gear. Also, you are right, I find that I have better endurance at the lower cadence. My fear is that I increase my interval cadence such that I cannot keep the power in zone for the required duration - thereby cutting the intervals short. I suppose I should just try and work on it a few rpms a session to get used to it. Thanks again.
On an unrelated topic, I hope the spam is taken care of. I have learned a ton from this forum and received a lot of encouragement (see my next thread). I would hate for this forum to be killed by the spam. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,574
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mundelein, IL
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
BTW - I tried to look at your other posts to find this answer, but you know how well the search fuction works. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,122
|
Have you tried a fluid trainer like the KKR or an eddy current brake trainer like the CT? It might feel better at higher rpms.
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
Because I also have a RealAxiom trainer, I curious to hear the relative accuracy, or lack thereof, of the PowerTap compared to the Real Axiom. Thanks... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
The accuracy is sadly lacking. At low wattages it is pretty close (under ~200 watts). Above that it is a bit of a crapshoot. For example, on a steady climb the Real Axiom is off by about 50 watts (the PT reading is 50 watts lower). However, when I do sprint workouts on the Real Axiom, my PT will get up to about 1300 watts while the Real Axiom will not get over ~800 watts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
Because my first real races of the year are always my team's crits (where I don't want to look unfit) and my body tends to "forget" how to deal with such efforts over the winter, for the past few years I've been doing some variable power work once a week in the ~6 weeks leading up to racing. If it's indoors, it's usually a drill like 2x20 minutes of 30/30's (in this caase, 30 seconds @ ~140% FTP followed by 30 seconds @ ~75% FTP, then repeat) where I'm doing the "on" portions at 90-110 rpm for some and 70-85 rpm for others. I think it helps me cope and it sure makes the minutes seem to go by faster than a straight 2x20. (I am also doing steady efforts during the week too.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
|
After I got my powertap I noticed I was spending most of my time outdoors between 65 and 80 rpms. I have been trying to do some workouts where I keep cadence over 100 rpms. Something which gets repeated often on forums is that most time trial records are set at cadences over 100 rpm. To me that seems like an ability which would need to be trained. I have a hard time imagining anyone starting out in cycling and spinning 90-110 rpm from their first time on the bike.
I have noticed it is close to impossible for me to think about my pedal stroke at a cadence of 100+, I have to just let it happen sub-conciously. I am hoping to get some improvement in economy through high-cadence work. Right now I loose about 20 watts over 100rpm. |
|
|
|