![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12
|
Hi I have recently acquired a polar cs600 which after a few days of trouble is now working great however a few questions for the wise out there
1) according to a hard 1 hour session my FTP is approx 200 but on Friday I went out on a 2 hour (60 km) ride and averaged 200 w what would you guestimate my FTP to be 2) I was climbing a small hill today (11 km long average gradient 6.1% but with several 15% thrown in ) and like previous hill climbs I found that my power output is considerably less than when on the flats why ? 3) at the moment I am doing 2or 3 x 20 mins of push as hard as I can for my z4 workouts as I found it nearly impossible to maintain equal power outdoors is this right or should I be training in another fashion FYI I am 39 yo weigh 67 kg and have been cycling for 9 months and love it TIA |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 14
|
You can test with this software if your average power is ok..
http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm (Best results on steep hills) You can also maka a test by riding the same speed on the small and big chain ring. Power values should be the same on both rings. Otherwise you have an installation problem. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
I do not believe the problem was with the sensor rather the engine. with a 15% gradient there is no way I can get the bike up the hill in the larger chain ring not ifI wish to continue to climb the next 11km |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 14
|
In question 2, you posted the power output on hills seems to be lower than on flats.
Therefore I suggested to calculate the power values with "kreuzotter" to see if the hill values are ok. If the values are ok, lets say <5% deviation to the calculated values, your flat maesurements could be faulty. (Maybe the distance between power sensor ans chain to high.) Regarding question 1 & 3, do you compare indoor to outdoor sessions? Polar power meter doesnīt work very well on trainers because of vibration problems. Or do you mean in #3 that itīs hard to produce a steady power output? Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Yup my power output is lower on the hills I believe that my PM is working correctly according to a similar program as kreuzotter I am originally from the UK but now live in the middle east as such winters here are very mild I almost never use the drainer (the d was not a typo ) In question 3 I meant as you said that I cant produce a steady output I appreciate your time and effort |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
Personally I now get my best power numbers on climbs and into headwinds. Tailwinds and easy descents require constant attention to keep my power from dropping. When climbing or beating a headwind I just have to ride steady and power tends to take care of itself. But everyone is different and it may take some time for you to figure out how to put out steady power in different conditions. Quote:
Quote:
-Dave |
|||
|
|
|