![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
|
Hi, my name is Evan, and I'm new to the forums and to cycling. I'm trying to compare between two Cannondales, either a 2008 Six13 6 or a 2008 Caad9 5. I'm interested mostly in performance and durability. Comfort is not as a big a deal. I'm also about 6'2, 6'3 and 160 lbs. Which bike would be better for me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33
|
I have ridden both and prefer the CAAD 9 for a much more responsive ride....I think the six13 felt abit dull and none responsive. Dont get me wrong the six13 is a nice ride....but you wont have the snappiness that the caad frame will give you if you want to race.
Having said all this I just moved onto a system six and it is awesome...I am 6 foot 3 and it is the best big frame bike I have ridden (63cm) I have ridden...if you have the money....do yourself a favour and get one....cannondale nailed it with this concept frame!!!! |
|
|
|