Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
08-12.-2007, 08:48 AM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bill Z-Snipper - Coward, Traitor and Apologist for Muslim Terrorists!
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
> "Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message > news:87k5nqffqh.fsf_-_@nospam.pacbell.net... > > "Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me> writes: > > > >> 'The insightful Flemish journalist Paul Belien observed last year, when > >> Muslims were rioting over the Pope's quoting the 600-year-old words of an > >> obscure emperor <snip> > > > > Yawn. > > Why the hell did you snip the above paragraph, you confounded idiot! F__ off, Dolan. It was snipped because it was irrelevant to what I posted. I wasn't commenting on what he said, so there was no reason to quote it. This is the standard practice used by authors for centuries. If you'd learn how to use a newsreader, you would know how to use the message ID I gave to look up the post I was replying to anyway. A decent newsreader can look up the post someone replied to as long as the server still has it. Mine can do that with a single keystroke. If your newsreader can't, get a better one. <rest of Dolan's crap and quotes of old posts ignored> -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
08-12.-2007, 09:34 AM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bill Z-Snipper - Coward, Traitor and Apologist for Muslim Terrorists!
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
> "Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message > news:87y7c6i0jt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net... > > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes: > > > >> "Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message > >> news:87k5nqffqh.fsf_-_@nospam.pacbell.net... > >> > "Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me> writes: > >> > > >> >> 'The insightful Flemish journalist Paul Belien observed last year, > >> >> when > >> >> Muslims were rioting over the Pope's quoting the 600-year-old words of > >> >> an > >> >> obscure emperor <snip> > >> > > >> > Yawn. > >> > >> Why the hell did you snip the above paragraph, you confounded idiot! > > > > F__ off, Dolan. It was snipped because it was irrelevant to what I > > posted. I wasn't commenting on what he said, so there was no reason > > to quote it. This is the standard practice used by authors for > > centuries. > > Nope, you were afraid of what was said because there is no way you could > respond <snip> You friggin idiot! I snipped what someone *else* had said and it was for the reasons I stated. I'll snip most of what you say too, in your case because you are so stupid that 99% of what you post is a waste of time. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
Linear Mode
