![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 124
|
Did 2x20min sweet spot on the turbo last night. One was 11.004km, the other 11.008km. This is a 4 metre difference, is it not? That can't be bad! NP and AP were the same.
Maybe I'm showing off, but I'm surprised that this consistency can be maintained. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,356
|
Quote:
Keep up the good work and dial into that steadiness as a way to get used to pacing time trials and similar steady efforts, -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
were you monitoring power or speed? Or just PE?
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 124
|
We have 2 kids and a third is on the way. Very little chance for any consistency other than on the bike...
I was monitoring power while trying to keep up with Di Luca up Mt Zoncolan. Sweet spot is such a narrow band that it is really hard to keep in it, even on an indoor trainer. I was pretty chuffed not to say surprised that the two were so close, as my power reading goes up and down like a yoyo, but since the window is only 14 watts there's got to be a close eye kept on the PT. Off topic, but I watched a sprint stage on this year's Giro, it was the first or second flat stage after Zoncolan. Two AG2R guys led into the final bend before the line and the lead guy's front wheel just went from under him, he was going that fast. Impressive crunch into the barriers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,117
|
Consistency.... accuracy it's so boring I'm switching back to heart rate it's like a box of chocolates you never know what your gonna get
![]()
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 124
|
Boring? You're doing it too easy if it's boring! Aren't you even gritting your teeth?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,117
|
I kinda lost track of my FTP after a tree climbing injury to the rib cage so I'm finding the sweet spot by HR for now and it's kinda fun trying to nail it down. But I know I'm on target if I choose a speed that gives me an average of 159bpm on the second interval of a 3x20.
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 124
|
So you're still chasing numbers? That's OK then. Wouldn't like to think we were missing all the fun!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
how long have you been training with power and the PT in particular? How many samples are you averaging for the display? What I'm getting at is: unless you have a long sample window, the PT displayed power will bounce around quite a bit even with steady 'real' power -- actually dependent on cadence as it relates to the 1.26sec 'aggregate sample' time. Also, sweet spot ain't that narrow unless your FTP is down around 70W! ![]()
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 124
|
I've been training with power and using a PT for a few years and seriously for 12 months.
No idea what the sampling is. But I don't think 88-94% is that big a window. For me that's 204-218W. What is it you're getting at? How big is your sweet spot? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
about 80W wide when in good condition. Admittedly a little narrower now. Basically 0.75-0.95 of FTP based on AP ...
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 124
|
It would seem your definition of sweet spot is much broader than the one I've been using, as defined by Andrew Coggan. Where did you determine your range? I'm always on the look-out for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
Later on, the familiar ,yet I believe conceptual diagrams, (or subjective vs. quantitative) were presented which confirmed what "we" had empirically found to be beneficial. So personally, I think there's plenty of float in that range and if one is not time/weather limited, it's the very best way to rack up lotsa CTL and give FTP a darned good nudge as well. Push up vs. pull up as someone once said. When doing such rides, I simply ride as hard as I can w/o blowing up before the end of the ride. I try to make the last hour AP/NP higher than the first. Last summer I did an entire week about 22hrs and close to 1500 TSS and I felt great after that (of course I wasn't working that week!). Anyhow for me it's simply a close to maximal well-paced effort from 1.5 to around 4hrs.
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|