![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16
|
I am currently training with a power tap pro and racing with a power tap sl and have had great performance from both. I am thininking of purchasing an ergomo system for my TT bike because I can't use a disc with the power tap and because I need a backlight as most of my mid week training is in the early morning hours. I have some concerns over the accuracy of the ergomo based on what I have read. If I cross check the erogomo with the power tap, assuming the ergomo is off, can I dial it in to match the power tap? If so how and how complex would the procedure be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 534
|
I tried the same thing a few months back and found it to be impossible. You can alter the K factor but I found that either the two would match at powers below threshold (but not above) or vice versa. I was unable to get the two to match consistently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
. I know SRM's are on ebay, but I'm not a fan of used equipment of this nature. I will give the SRM some serious thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
Run the same length cranks on both bikes? Why the difference? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
I have several friends in the domestic pro peloton too - but i don't look to them for biomechanical advice! It will make 3/10ths of no difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
|
Quote:
I found those small led lights with the elastic band that typically wrap around the stay, work really well on the front of the helmet with the light pointing down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
I recently had the Ergomo re-installed (properly). Voila - it now works like a charm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 534
|
Quote:
I chose to keep my PT's as I was just testing the Ergomo for the SA agent. Differences were around 5-10% but on a highly variable ride such as a race this made a difference of some significance. I liked the Ergomo functionality but I did not enoy the complex nature of the installation or the inconsistency when compared to my PT. On balance I think the Ergomo is not quite there yet - in the last few months they have realled all South African units to Germany and made some adjustments (I am not aware what) and we are now going to retest them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,592
|
Quote:
This was essentially my experience as well. That is, the response of the Ergomo Pro that I beta tested clearly wasn't linear, such that adjusting the K factor would not have solved the problem. It wasn't an issue of left-right balance, as I observed the same curvilinearity when pedaling with only my left leg. My guess is that the Ergomo b.b. can't adequately distinguish between torque and bending moments when the forces are being applied in a cyclic manner - that would explain why evaluating/calibrating one at a constant torque doesn't reveal the problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,592
|
Quote:
Don't you mean 2.5/10ths? ![]() |
|
|
|
|