Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Regional Cycling Forums > Australia and New Zealand
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Cell vs Atomik

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19-10.-2007, 11:11 AM   #1
danien
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Default Cell vs Atomik

Hi all,
Im in the market for a sub $500 mountain bike.
Would prefer a softtail which therefore limits the options a bit.
I have been looking at Cell Bikes DHX2
http://www.cellbikes.com.au/p_48_CE...n_Townhill_Bike
and the Atomik Alpha
http://www.atomik.com.au/cycle_alpha.htm

Pros of the Atomik Alpha:
-Better shocks front and back
-Sexier looking bike
-
Pros of the Cell DHX2
-Better shimano gear
-Lighter
-double crown fork

If anyone has any comment on the specs of either one or has seen/ ridden these bikes I would appreciate your comments.

regards
Danien
danien is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 12:14 PM   #2
JeremyP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

At that price range I would not consider purchasing a dually. Basically these bikes are made to look like down hill / trail bikes but on most occasions, have a sticker near the BB saying that they are not suitable for off road conditions .

Go to you local bike store and get fitted on a Giant hardtail. Better to get a bike that fits without disk brakes and has pedalling efficiency. If this is for commuting, then a hybrid / flat bar road bike would be the way to go.

Good Luck.
JeremyP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 01:24 PM   #3
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,158
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

Definitely only a hardtail at that price, you'll regret any dual sus bike bought new for <$2000. I agree that a Giant would be a fair choice.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 01:54 PM   #4
danien
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

you guys are killing me.
I was hoping for someone to agree with me.
Can someone explain exactly the problem with softtail at this price, without quoting the bad old days when every softtail was crap. What exactly is the extra $1500 buying me?

Thanks for the prompt replies though.

regards
Danien
danien is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 02:01 PM   #5
62vette
Registered User
 
62vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay of Plenty
Posts: 873
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

Quote:
Originally Posted by danien
What exactly is the extra $1500 buying me?
A bike that won't fall apart and hurt you.

Go the hardtail for that budget.
62vette is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 02:05 PM   #6
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,158
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

At that price it will be very heavy and have poorly-damped, bobbing-prone, fragile rear suspension.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 02:14 PM   #7
danien
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

poorly dampened? An RTS 500 is not to be sneezed at is it?

Heavy? 15kg aint to bad is it?
danien is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 02:17 PM   #8
danien
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

Being new to this forum I should behave, but can I ask a bolshy question:

Have any of you guys actually ridden a sub $500 softtail in the last 6 months?

regards

Danien
danien is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 03:02 PM   #9
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,158
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

There is a reason that almost all dual sus frames have a dual pivot rear swing arm - this is to counterract pedal bob (and, allegedly, braking bob, but I've not seen them do that successfully). When it is done well, you can shove almost any rear shock in the frame and it will work well. If you want to use a single pivot swing arm, and you'd only do this if you wanted a really light bike or you were using an old frame that you couldn't part with, then you need a stable platform rear shock or you'll be stuck with a pogo stick of a bike.
Both these bikes are single pivot designs. Neither has a stable platform shock. Ever seen a dual suspension huffy on the road? - up/down/up/down goes the rider as he trundles along. These bikes will behave like the huffy.
If you get a good hardtail frame, you can upgrade it with better components as you go. The first thing that you'll want to replace with these bikes is the frame.
Don't know anything about that shock other than that I can't find any reviews of it on the net and that it isn't Fox, Manitou, Rock Shox, Cane Creek, Magura or Marzocchi.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 03:03 PM   #10
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,158
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

Quote:
Originally Posted by danien
Being new to this forum I should behave, but can I ask a bolshy question:

Have any of you guys actually ridden a sub $500 softtail in the last 6 months?

regards

Danien

I think that you know the answer to this question.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2007, 04:33 PM   #11
JeremyP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Cell vs Atomik

Quote:
Originally Posted by danien
Being new to this forum I should behave, but can I ask a bolshy question:

Have any of you guys actually ridden a sub $500 softtail in the last 6 months?

regards

Danien
No, but the design on those low end bikes haven't changed for the past 10 years. Put it this way, I find that the maestro system on my mtb could still be a lot better, and it is light years ahead of what is offered in those two examples. If your heart is set on getting one, then by all means purchase one. But you'll end up cursing the bike while you're on it after the initial euphoria. Let's face it, $500 can get you a deposit on a nice hardtail with Deore LX / Hone groupset which will ride circles around those bikes - in all environments!
JeremyP is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet