Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Ironman 2007

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15-10.-2007, 06:17 PM   #1
sidewind
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Default Ironman 2007

Hi,
some power values from the IM seem to be here:
http://2peak.com/srm/srm_kona_2007/hawaii.php

For a layman it's strange how some of the reported powers seem to drop after ~120 mins, is this due the SRM drift or GPRS coverage or race course or smthng I can't imagin?
__________________
These are layman's opinions, expressed in language no self-respecting scientist woul be using.
sidewind is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-10.-2007, 07:09 PM   #2
patrick_
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 19
Default Re: Ironman 2007

You can get the datafiles at http://www.srm.de/deutsch/IronmanHawaii.html , so you can check for dropouts.

I think part of the power output change is due to course profile and tactics.
patrick_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-10.-2007, 01:07 AM   #3
TamMan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 35
Default Re: Ironman 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick_
You can get the datafiles at http://www.srm.de/deutsch/IronmanHawaii.html , so you can check for dropouts.

I think part of the power output change is due to course profile and tactics.
Can this be true? If we look at the 60min values as calculated by WKO+, one of the guys ends up with a 5.9 and the other with a 3.2?
TamMan is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet