![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 66
|
Whats everyone's average cadence? I know there are multiple variables in this for everyone, but i'm still new, only about 2 months, and only ride a few times a week. I want to know what is a good average cadence that beginners should either try to get or be at?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 245
|
Average is 73 rpm, but this is what matters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
|
I'm a junior rider and because we have limited gearing in races my average is about 100-110 on the flat and 80-90 uphill. Super spin like Lance!
__________________
"Don't buy upgrades; ride up grades." - Eddy Merckx Orbea Urkiola Ultegra Groupset Ksyrium ES Wheels |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,620
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,033
|
Quote:
I suspect if you did a distribution that just contained cadence whilst seated then that graph would turn into an almost perfect normal distribution, which is kinda what you'd expect. That low end bulge is probably caused by the fact that most people drop their cadence when they stand up on hills (I know I do for starters, and so do most of the people i ride with). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
It will never be a perfect distribution as the range for lower cadence is much higher than the range for higher cadence. Eg, 90-110, but who can spin at 120-130 for long periods (>1hr)? Who can spin at 70-80 for long periods?
__________________
My club: University of Illinois-Chicago Cycling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 245
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
So what's more relevant from training and physical adaptation's point of view? Average/Mean or Median? Does the SD spread also have an impact? ![]()
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Many people have extremely inefficient pedal strokes, but track riders rarely have to be concerned about that. The idea is to make sure your pedal stroke while under power isn't too low to cause physical injury, or too high to cause an unnecessary increase in HR/lactic acid buildup or prevent you from responding to attacks. Cadence is highly individule. I prefer 105, others prefer 95. To each their own...for the most part.
__________________
My club: University of Illinois-Chicago Cycling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
|
PS, average doesn't matter as some cadence monitors record "0" cadence, or a very hilly area would see a decrease in cadence and a shift in the SD.
A realistic median or a realistic mode is what you would look for. That, or possibly the adjusted mean for things like time trials. Come to think of it, the adjusted mean over a SD would probably be best. What spread of numbers do you spend most of your time?
__________________
My club: University of Illinois-Chicago Cycling |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
|
Yes, median makes much more sense.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,608
|
76 rpm over the last 3 years. Hope that helps.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Why?
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|