Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


How long is too long?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-09.-2007, 03:30 AM   #1
lanierb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
Default How long is too long?

Question: suppose I'm training to maximize FTP and I do one longish ride per week. How long is too long, to the point of being detrimental to your training? Is it 4 hours, 5 hours, ...? In terms of CTL: 300, 400?

The reason i ask is that I ride once a week with a group that likes to go long and I frequently hit CTLs of 300+ on that ride (and, rarely, much larger).
lanierb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-09.-2007, 03:43 AM   #2
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,691
Default Re: How long is too long?

I don't know if there's such a thing as 'too long' in the sense of hurting your FTP training, but I doubt that 5hr+ rides are really giving a lot of bang for the buck in terms of improving FTP. Another concern would be the amount of recovery time needed from those rides and the potential training that might be lost in the following days.

Does recovery from those rides detract from more FTP-focused training that you might otherwise do?
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-09.-2007, 04:21 AM   #3
daveryanwyoming
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,506
Default Re: How long is too long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by frenchyge
I don't know if there's such a thing as 'too long' in the sense of hurting your FTP training, but I doubt that 5hr+ rides are really giving a lot of bang for the buck in terms of improving FTP. Another concern would be the amount of recovery time needed from those rides and the potential training that might be lost in the following days.

Does recovery from those rides detract from more FTP-focused training that you might otherwise do?
+1 frenchyge

The recovery part in particular is the reason I didn't do too many real long rides this past season. I did a few, they were fun and since I tend to ride a lot of mid to high Tempo on longer rides they usually led to a minipeak a few days to a week later. The trouble was the big TSS days also required additional recovery days either totally off the bike or rides below desired training levels. So I'd get a big TSS bump with associated ATL and CTL peaks but then I'd lose a few days of quality training while I recovered.

All in all I think I did better with shorter rides focusing on quality and fewer long rides. I had no endurance trouble on the few long rides and even one very long race(~ 10 hours) I did this season so I'm pretty well convinced that you don't absolutely need long training rides to handle long events.

-Dave
daveryanwyoming is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-09.-2007, 05:46 AM   #4
lanierb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
Default Re: How long is too long?

Recovery is one aspect, but if you go long once a week, your body starts to get used to it so it seems like you're recovering okay. What I'm wondering is whether you're somehow trading off long endurance (the ability to go hard for hours) against speed at shorter distance (<=1hr). That is, is going long actually detrimental to FTP? The reason I ask is that sometimes I feel like the long rides actually make me less fast.
lanierb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-09.-2007, 06:46 AM   #5
wiredued
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,172
Default Re: How long is too long?

Got this from http://www.cyclingforums.com/t-380705-15-2.html by Dr Coggan leader of the Cogganites. It sure seems to be true in training it is hard to stay in the sweet spot after 4 hours.

Q: By extension, do you think it is a waste of time to train longer than 2 hrs?

A: "No. (Although interestingly, Greg Lemond told me on Monday that he thought it was a waste of time to train longer than about 4 h...)"


Quote:
Originally Posted by lanierb
Recovery is one aspect, but if you go long once a week, your body starts to get used to it so it seems like you're recovering okay. What I'm wondering is whether you're somehow trading off long endurance (the ability to go hard for hours) against speed at shorter distance (<=1hr). That is, is going long actually detrimental to FTP? The reason I ask is that sometimes I feel like the long rides actually make me less fast.
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3

Last edited by wiredued : 22-09.-2007 at 06:54 AM.
wiredued is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-09.-2007, 02:52 AM   #6
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,691
Default Re: How long is too long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lanierb
Recovery is one aspect, but if you go long once a week, your body starts to get used to it so it seems like you're recovering okay. What I'm wondering is whether you're somehow trading off long endurance (the ability to go hard for hours) against speed at shorter distance (<=1hr). That is, is going long actually detrimental to FTP? The reason I ask is that sometimes I feel like the long rides actually make me less fast.

The body will adapt to whatever stimulus is provided. There's nothing about riding slow that prevents the body from being able to ride fast *unless* all that slow riding reduces the amount of harder training that is performed, hence my questions about recovery days from your high TSS rides. 300-400 TSS rides would probably mean at least a couple days off for me, which means I've lost the ride day, plus the next couple days, from my available FTP-training time.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-09.-2007, 11:43 AM   #7
lanierb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
Default Re: How long is too long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiredued
Got this from http://www.cyclingforums.com/t-380705-15-2.html by Dr Coggan leader of the Cogganites. It sure seems to be true in training it is hard to stay in the sweet spot after 4 hours.

Q: By extension, do you think it is a waste of time to train longer than 2 hrs?

A: "No. (Although interestingly, Greg Lemond told me on Monday that he thought it was a waste of time to train longer than about 4 h...)"

So...waste of time, but not detrimental in itself except for the recovery aspect. Good.
lanierb is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet