Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-08.-2007, 02:41 PM   #1
vladav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Arrow Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

I'm wondering how one would design a meaningful + repeatable test for trying out several frames using my PT 2.4. Ultimately using this to help decide on a frame for my sprinter body type/style. (Pb 10s power on a flexy frame is just under 1300w @ 162lbs. Normal sprint is between 1100-1200.)

BTW: looking for a frame in the $3-4k range. Maybe some racing for fun but mostly serious club rides so 100+mi comfort is definitely a factor.

Got some great suggestions in another thread promoting TIME, & BMC. Any others are welcome too.

Looking forward to your ideas...
Dave
vladav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 01:31 AM   #2
peterpen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 343
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

I don't think you can. The range of variation in your sprint power is probably greater than the range of variation in frame stiffness. Add to that the fact that PT's (IIRC) aren't particularly precise at the shortest durations, and "meaningful & repeatable" moves out of reach.

If I were overly concerned with stiffness, I'd look at a) lab test numbers from Tour Magazin and b) how each frame felt when I sprinted (using same wheels, tire pressure, bar, stem, cranks.) Not sure you can find a shop that will let you do the complete version of b) though, so I'd settle for same wheels at same pressure.

FWIW, Time frames are noodles in the lab. In your price range I'd look at Canyon, Storck, C'dale System 6, Cervelo R3, and custom builds from Crumpton or Ruegamer.
peterpen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 04:04 AM   #3
donrhummy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 262
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Yeah, but assuming you could find a route that would give you basically the same conditions, you could pedal at 250 watts for say 30 minutes and then look to see exactly how many feet you went. Do the test multiple times for each bike. If one bike consistently travels further, then you know it's transferring more of your energy into forward movement.
donrhummy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 05:42 AM   #4
daveryanwyoming
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Yeah, but assuming you could find a route that would give you basically the same conditions, you could pedal at 250 watts for say 30 minutes and then look to see exactly how many feet you went. Do the test multiple times for each bike. If one bike consistently travels further, then you know it's transferring more of your energy into forward movement.
Assuming no changes in wind, air density, passing traffic...... Try some outdoor CdA regression testing and you'll see how tricky it can be to remove environmental variables.
daveryanwyoming is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 08:15 AM   #5
beerco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vladav
on a flexy frame


How do you know your frame is flexy?
beerco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 09:44 AM   #6
vladav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerco
How do you know your frame is flexy?
Well it could be a combination of components, but it's an '05 Trek 2100. alum triangle + carbon stays. A $1200 18.9lb road bike can't be all that rigid - can it?

Also, I notice on the trainer the front wheel rolls about an inch forward with a shift in weight.
Also out-of-the-saddle in a sprint, I can feel the frame snap back after each pedal stroke. My arms have to do an exaggerated pre-torque of the bars to counteract the pedaling forces, and then act as shock absorbers mid-pedal stroke because everything is springing back.

Dave

Last edited by vladav : 08-08.-2007 at 09:53 AM.
vladav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 09:57 AM   #7
beerco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vladav
Well it could be a combination of components, but it's an '05 Trek 2100. alum triangle + carbon stays. A $1200 18.9lb road bike can't be all that rigid - can it?


heavy and stiff is very easy to do. Light and stiff is not. Your frame is probably quite stiff.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vladav

Also, I notice on the trainer the front wheel rolls about an inch forward with a shift in weight.
Also out-of-the-saddle in a sprint, I can feel the frame snap back after each pedal stroke. My arms have to do an exaggerated pre-torque of the bars to counteract the pedaling forces, and then act as shock absorbers mid-pedal stroke because everything is springing back.

Dave


For $1200, I doubt your bike has a carbon steer tube, but that is a source of flex that many can misinterpret as frame flex. "Feel" is not something that we can use to determine how flexy a frame is.
beerco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 09:59 AM   #8
vladav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Yeah, but assuming you could find a route that would give you basically the same conditions, you could pedal at 250 watts for say 30 minutes and then look to see exactly how many feet you went. Do the test multiple times for each bike. If one bike consistently travels further, then you know it's transferring more of your energy into forward movement.
I like the theory behind your idea; however that would be a design for measuring a frame for the steady state forces of a TT.
I'm pretty sure a thrashing violent sprint would require a different aproach.

And as Dave R W pointed out there's too many variables over that time frame. (And possibly same for what I want to do too...)

Dave
vladav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 10:02 AM   #9
beerco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Oh yea, and to actually answer your original question, power loss due to frame flex couldn't be more than a few watts (less than one I would expect). It's totally impractical to measure it at the rear wheel.
beerco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 10:03 AM   #10
vladav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerco
"Feel" is not something that we can use to determine how flexy a frame is.


Agreed - which gets at the heart of this thread
vladav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 10:07 AM   #11
vladav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerco
Oh yea, and to actually answer your original question, power loss due to frame flex couldn't be more than a few watts (less than one I would expect). It's totally impractical to measure it at the rear wheel.
From where do you arrive at that number?
vladav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 10:34 AM   #12
beerco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vladav
From where do you arrive at that number?


It's an educated guess based on my experience and a degree in engineering.

Remember that power is work over time. Work = force x distance. So, even though forces are high when sprinting, most of that force goes into turning the cranks so maybe your frame is flexing what, 5 to 10mm with every stroke absolute tops?

So you've got power lost due to frame flex = Force(high)xDistance(very very small)xTime (slow, even at 120rpm) = a low number. Tire flex probably accounts for a lot more power loss. There's also speculation that at least some of the power lost due to frame flex would be returned when the frame flexes back.

I believe if you search on biketechreview.com archives you'll find some discussions using actual numbers.

edit: p.s. I haven't actually run the numbers so I will grant that I might be wrong and it could be as many as like 5w but I would still guess that it's closer to less than one.
beerco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 01:35 PM   #13
vladav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerco
It's an educated guess based on my experience and a degree in engineering.

Remember that power is work over time. Work = force x distance. So, even though forces are high when sprinting, most of that force goes into turning the cranks so maybe your frame is flexing what, 5 to 10mm with every stroke absolute tops?

So you've got power lost due to frame flex = Force(high)xDistance(very very small)xTime (slow, even at 120rpm) = a low number. Tire flex probably accounts for a lot more power loss. There's also speculation that at least some of the power lost due to frame flex would be returned when the frame flexes back.

I believe if you search on biketechreview.com archives you'll find some discussions using actual numbers.

edit: p.s. I haven't actually run the numbers so I will grant that I might be wrong and it could be as many as like 5w but I would still guess that it's closer to less than one.
Fair enough - Thanks for the input!
vladav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08.-2007, 09:15 PM   #14
beerco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerco
So you've got power lost due to frame flex = Force(high)xDistance(very very small)xTime (slow, even at 120rpm) = a low number.


Before anyone yells at me too much, this should be:

Force(high)xDistance(very very small)/Time (slow or relatively large, even at 120rpm)

Sorry for the error.
beerco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08.-2007, 09:56 AM   #15
vladav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: Using PowerTap test to decide a new frame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpen
I'd look at a) lab test numbers from Tour Magazin...
After spending about 2 hours looking for it, I have to ask how I get a copy of that?

Found www.tour-magazin.de site in German > translated on babelfish > still clueless. Of course googled too...
vladav is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet