![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
I think I was reading something by slipstream about its TTs and how they used watt meters in a recent race to ensure they eased up on watts on a downhill (where power loses its importance relative to aerodynamics) and save that energy for an uphill (where it's more about power and less about aerodynamics).
I've always aimed in tris to have constant output, but I think that it may be worth going a few MPH slower on a downhill to have the power to put out harder on the up. Is this how fast riders do it? I'm not talking about a downhill so steep you're spinning out a 53/11, but just a relatively decent downhill (say 33 mph). |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: WA, in Australia
Posts: 1,349
|
What I like to do is hide on the uphill, attack over the crest when people are resting, power for 1/2 the downhill then sprint up the next hill. I'd usually do this on the last/second last hill though and I'll get a few who come with me....
TTs are different. I try to keep my heart rate constant so I ease up on the uphill a bit, power down the other side, and repeat coming back. You can keep a better rhythm on the flat if you keep your output constant. You don't want to let your HR plummet on a downhill.
__________________
BMC SL01 SRAM Force thank you crank n' cycles...If you are ever in SW WA, take a trip to Crank N' Cycles. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,386
|
Quote:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/e...pt=AbstractPlus http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a778564753~db=all~jumptype=rss http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713808387~db=all http://sportsci.org/jour/9804/dps.html Basically you get the best bang for your buck using your power on the harder sections and less return for your investment going hard on the easier sections where everyone goes fairly fast and it takes a lot more power to go significantly faster. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 888
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
Thanks! This makes sense...I read all the articles posted above. I suppose for wind if there is constant wind, it's moot, but in gusts a person would want to temporarily cut their effort a bit...?
Anyway, hills are the main concern, so based on the articles, they advise at the top of a hill continuing with a solid effort until you near terminal velocity and then easing up on the down. ![]() |
|
|
|