![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 72
|
I had a mtb race today and I was reviewing the results this evening. Based on time, for me to match the leaders of my category, I would need to improve my times by 20%. However, I think most of us can conclude that power doesn't correlate very well with actual time in an event where there are so many variables, ed. total elevation gain, descending ability, rolling resistance, etc. So, simply trying to, say, improve my FTP 20% isn't going to cut it as an actual predictor of performance.
I found a link to Kruezotter on this board and was playing around with it a little. Pretty cool little app. Much better than analyticcyling. There are still some gaps in the data input fields that make predicting the actual average or normative power needed to achieve a specific time impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
Last edited by Pelotonium : 16-07.-2007 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|