Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > General Mountain Bike Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


32H vs 36H spokes for MTBs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-06.-2007, 01:13 PM   #1
Garyh_GONP07
Registered User
 
Garyh_GONP07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 52
Lightbulb 32H vs 36H spokes for MTBs

Over lunch today a fellow biker and I were discussing 32 vs 36H spoking for MTB wheels. BOth of us have been into heavy touring (36H/4x patterns) and MTBs (36H/4x predominantly). Years ago bikers would swear by 36H for strength and taughtness. Nowadays there seems to be an entrenched trend toward the softer, "supple" (as we have known it) 32H pattern. What are the variations and why??
__________________
"I want to ride my bicycle, I want to ride my bike.
I want to ride my bicycle, I want to ride it where I like."
—Freddie Mercury, 'Bicycle Race'

Last edited by Garyh_GONP07 : 29-06.-2007 at 02:15 PM.
Garyh_GONP07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07.-2007, 03:57 AM   #2
victorthewombat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: 32H vs 36H spokes for MTBs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garyh_GONP07
Over lunch today a fellow biker and I were discussing 32 vs 36H spoking for MTB wheels. BOth of us have been into heavy touring (36H/4x patterns) and MTBs (36H/4x predominantly). Years ago bikers would swear by 36H for strength and taughtness. Nowadays there seems to be an entrenched trend toward the softer, "supple" (as we have known it) 32H pattern. What are the variations and why??


36 h 4 cross the spokes usually leave too much spoke on the hub shell leading to premature hub shell breakage. 4 cross patterns usually accompany 40h or 48h shells, this is why 40 and 48 hole hubs are so very popular with the touring crowd and 36 hole hubs are predominately accompanied by 3x. Spokes and rims are now very much improved since the early eighties thus the 36 spokes for strength is outdated. Rim section dictates wheel strength. Spoke selection dictates the suppleness of the wheel. That said, all my mountain wheels are 32 spoke for cross and touring I use 36 front and rear because the increase in length of wheel life outweighs any weight savings.

Of course, there any many permutations to the arguments above. Ride what works for you.

VTW
victorthewombat is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet