Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-09.-2006, 06:59 AM   #1
m.indurain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Default Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Here you find the best times for the climb of Alpe d Huez:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpe_d'Huez

37'36'' Armstrong 2004 (Time Trial)
38'05'' Armstrong 2001
38'10'' Indurain 1995

As you can read in the link the distance for indurains time was 700 m longer. If you assume a average speed for those 700 m of 50 km/h you have the following virtual armstrong-times:

38'26'' Armstrong 2004 (Time Trial)
38'55'' Armstrong 2001

So Armstrong could not even beat the Indurain-Time in a time trial (Indurain had Madeleine and Croix the Fer in his legs). Indurains weight was about 79 kg and Armstrongs weight 71 kg ... The weight of Armstrongs bike was about 1 - 2 kg less than indurains ...

And Pantani 1995: He rode the climb 1'36'' faster than Armstrong in Time Trial!

Last edited by m.indurain : 04-09.-2006 at 07:09 AM.
m.indurain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09.-2006, 04:55 AM   #2
m.indurain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Some data of the world championships in Columbia 1995:

Date: 8th of october 1995 (!!!)
Length: 265,5 km (15 x 17,7 km)
Height Meters Total: 4.725 (!!!)
Lowest point of the race: 2.540 m (!!!)
Highest point of the race: 2.850 m (!!!)
Riders, who finished the race: 20

1st Olano (ESP, Indurain allowed him to attack and controlled Pantani)
2nd Indurain (ESP)
3rd Pantani (ITA)

So, who says that Indurain was not a very good clymber?
m.indurain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09.-2006, 06:04 AM   #3
Savagewolf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 29
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

I think the key part of cycling is tying it all together, and doing it consistantly. It's one thing to be the best at one skill. It's a whole other thing when you are at or near the top in many things and can do it consistancy.

Wearing the yellow jersy at the end is usually the difference in the two.
Savagewolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09.-2006, 06:11 AM   #4
m.indurain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savagewolf
I think the key part of cycling is tying it all together, and doing it consistantly. It's one thing to be the best at one skill. It's a whole other thing when you are at or near the top in many things and can do it consistancy.

Wearing the yellow jersy at the end is usually the difference in the two.

Cycling is not only TDF. It is - not only - also Giro, world championships and olympic games.
m.indurain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09.-2006, 07:39 AM   #5
lwedge
Registered User
 
lwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shingle Springs, CA
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by m.indurain
Cycling is not only TDF. It is - not only - also Giro, world championships and olympic games.

It would have been great to see them race against each other in their prime.

lw
__________________
If your traveling to the LakeTahoe, Apple Hill, Folsom area ? Then check out Charles Lee's site for some great information on rides, maps and events in this Northern California area. .
http://www.beautifulvista.com
Great wine !
http://www.chevalierwinery.com/
lwedge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09.-2006, 11:02 AM   #6
DiabloScott
Registered User
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mt. Diablo, California
Posts: 2,249
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by m.indurain
And Pantani 1995: He rode the climb 1'36'' faster than Armstrong in Time Trial!



Yeah, but Pantani was a doper.
__________________


http://diabloscott.blogspot.com
DiabloScott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09.-2006, 04:54 PM   #7
m.indurain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
Yeah, but Pantani was a doper.
And Armstrong and Indurain were no dopers ...




For your information:

Indurain and Armstrong were tested positive (Armstrong 1999). Pantani was never tested positive. But im am sure he doped as Armstrong and Indurain.
m.indurain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09.-2006, 04:46 AM   #8
earthbound
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by m.indurain
And Armstrong and Indurain were no dopers ...




For your information:

Indurain and Armstrong were tested positive (Armstrong 1999). Pantani was never tested positive. But im am sure he doped as Armstrong and Indurain.

Sorry to correct you but neither Indurain or Armstrong have ever failed a doping test. Pantani was tested in the 1999 Giro with only a couple of days to go and whilst leading on GC and his blood test failed the haematocrit level and he was disqualified from the race.
earthbound is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09.-2006, 04:51 AM   #9
earthbound
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Default Re: Indurain better climber than Armstrong?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by lwedge
It would have been great to see them race against each other in their prime.

lw

They did race together and Indurain slayed Armstrong and everyone else for that matter. He was a machine of a cyclist. This is the man who thought nothing of winning the Giro over 3 weeks in May and then the Tour in July, TWICE!!

Arsmtrong did famuosly beat Indurain in the World's denying him a hat trick that year (griwo, tour, worlds) If it hadn't been for the filthy weather I have every confidence Mig would have won.

If Indurain hadn't spent too many years sacrificing himself for others as a super domestique he would have won a lot, lot more. Maybe not so many spring classics because he did hate that cold Belgian weather.
earthbound is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet