![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
|
I've recently bought my first mountainbike (Rockhopper Disk) after 10 years away from cycling (used to cycle for triathalons).
The bike came with a Rock Shox J3 front shock and I've read a few reviews suggesting this isn't a very good fork. My questions are: 1) Is the J3 considered a poor fork? I know it's cheap, but does that mean it really has shortcomings? 2) What differentiates this fork from a better performing front fork? 3) What are peoples recommendations for a better fron fork for trail riding and possibly some low grade local XC races. Cheers dp |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
This is a NICE fork, it rides real nice. It offers a lock out, if you need it. Most do not offer this kind of ride with out bottoming out easy. I can bottom it out in a very hard drop with my 215LB butt on the seat, and it has to be hard but I can bottom it out. More expensive forks have up to twice the travel, and a better ride. If you want to spend alot you can get a better fork. These work great in heavy cornering etc. They are great for a nice ride while chasing cotton tail rabbits through the sage brush. I work them to death. I will have to waite and see if it lasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 103
|
This lot seem quite happy with it;
http://www.mtbr.com/reviews/2006_fr...ct_126421.shtml the only guy who appears to really dislike it sounds like he is waiting on a warrenty issue. Cheaper forks tend to be a bit heavier, lack some of the adjustability of higher end forks. But since sram took over rock shox most people have noted a great improvement in the forks. At the end of the day, if ur happy with the ride (try ur mates bikes and compare them), ride 'em till they die and replace! I'm a park ranger and I see as many folk on budget hardtails as on highend one's, and it's usually the rider and not the bike that defines how fast they go!
__________________
---------------------------------------------------riding is a privilege - don't be a dick
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17
|
With forks, "better" usually means lighter and has more available adjustments. remote lock-out etc... Your J3 is "better" than my J1. Mine is "poorer" than yours, but I'm perfectly happy with the J1. It performs just fine for my needs. YMMV. If you are gonna race, you might need lighter. If you climb, you might want the remote lock-out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
|
Thanks for all the feed-back.
I'm happy with the fork and as I ride more and improve I'm beginning to see that in now way is the fork holding me back....... more my lack of ability! I've had the remote lock-out fitted and it makes it much easier to ride varying trails...... I will ride it till it breaks and then look for something lighter! Last edited by darkpromenade : 31-08.-2006 at 12:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
|
weight is not the only issue. the stiffness of the fork and the adjustments available (not just lock out) make a big difference. You will be able to tune a better fork so that it provides damping on bumps but doesnt compress when climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|