Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-07.-2006, 07:30 AM   #1
Pablo Juan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Default Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

Does anybody know how a climb is categorised? Can you estimate what your training route climbs might be?
Pablo Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07.-2006, 03:28 PM   #2
Pablo Juan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Default Re: Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

Obviously a stupid question
Pablo Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07.-2006, 06:13 PM   #3
Eldrack
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,065
Default Re: Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

Not entirely, and tbh I don't think its an exact science, hence the lack of replies. Catagory depends on 4 things (I think), length, steepness, position in the race, quality of the road (width, surface etc). Not entirely sure about how much that last one makes a difference though.

Take the Cauberg for example, last climb in stage 3 this year.
http://www.salite.ch/cauberg.htm. Its not very long, but has a steep section in the middle. Probably looking at a cat 4. However as it is right near the end of the stage everyone is going to be going up it real fast, hence the third catagory tag.

If you want to catagorise climbs at home, try comparing them to climbs in the TdF. Climbs of similar length/gradient. Won't be exact but you should get some idea.
Eldrack is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07.-2006, 02:31 PM   #4
ed073
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,496
Default Re: Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

What do the climb categories mean?
Climbs are graded according to their severity, from fourth to first category, plus the very hardest climbs which are considered 'hors categorie' or 'beyond category'. The gradings take into account the length and steepness of the climb and the position of the climb in the stage, with the quality of the road surface making up a final, less important factor.

How are the gradients calculated?
A grade of, say, ten percent, simply means that the road ascends ten metres for every 100m it travels horizontally. For those with a mathematical bent, it's a simple tangent ratio. Climb grades are averages for the whole climb, so a straightforward-sounding six percent grade can hide some much steeper pitches that make it a monster.

I know that climbs are categorised Cat 1, 2, 3, etc., but is a "1" more difficult than a "4", or is it the reverse?

The categorisation of climbs is determined by the race organisers, and is based on the steepness of the climb, the position of the climb on the stage, and to a lesser extent, the quality of the road surface. Generally speaking, a climb needs to have an average gradient of around 4-5% and a vertical elevation of at least 100 metres for a climb to be categorised. A hors categorie (literally meaning 'out of category') climb is the most difficult, with an elevation usually 1,500 metres (5,000 feet) or more above sea level - while a category 3 climb is one of the easiest, with an elevation usually in the range of 300-600 metres (1,000-2,000 feet) above sea level.
ed073 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07.-2006, 03:43 PM   #5
Pablo Juan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Default Re: Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

Thanks for the reply. Much appreciated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ed073
What do the climb categories mean?
Climbs are graded according to their severity, from fourth to first category, plus the very hardest climbs which are considered 'hors categorie' or 'beyond category'. The gradings take into account the length and steepness of the climb and the position of the climb in the stage, with the quality of the road surface making up a final, less important factor.

How are the gradients calculated?
A grade of, say, ten percent, simply means that the road ascends ten metres for every 100m it travels horizontally. For those with a mathematical bent, it's a simple tangent ratio. Climb grades are averages for the whole climb, so a straightforward-sounding six percent grade can hide some much steeper pitches that make it a monster.

I know that climbs are categorised Cat 1, 2, 3, etc., but is a "1" more difficult than a "4", or is it the reverse?

The categorisation of climbs is determined by the race organisers, and is based on the steepness of the climb, the position of the climb on the stage, and to a lesser extent, the quality of the road surface. Generally speaking, a climb needs to have an average gradient of around 4-5% and a vertical elevation of at least 100 metres for a climb to be categorised. A hors categorie (literally meaning 'out of category') climb is the most difficult, with an elevation usually 1,500 metres (5,000 feet) or more above sea level - while a category 3 climb is one of the easiest, with an elevation usually in the range of 300-600 metres (1,000-2,000 feet) above sea level.
Pablo Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07.-2006, 03:44 PM   #6
Pablo Juan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Default Re: Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

Thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldrack
Not entirely, and tbh I don't think its an exact science, hence the lack of replies. Catagory depends on 4 things (I think), length, steepness, position in the race, quality of the road (width, surface etc). Not entirely sure about how much that last one makes a difference though.

Take the Cauberg for example, last climb in stage 3 this year.
http://www.salite.ch/cauberg.htm. Its not very long, but has a steep section in the middle. Probably looking at a cat 4. However as it is right near the end of the stage everyone is going to be going up it real fast, hence the third catagory tag.

If you want to catagorise climbs at home, try comparing them to climbs in the TdF. Climbs of similar length/gradient. Won't be exact but you should get some idea.
Pablo Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07.-2006, 04:07 PM   #7
ed073
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,496
Default Re: Climbs - how is the CAT calculated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablo Juan
Thanks for the reply. Much appreciated.



too easy.


Cut and pasted from cyclingnews.com
ed073 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet