![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
|
Simple question!
There are many thorns were I have just moved. How do I force a presta valve core back through the valve stem with out damaging the tube after sliming it? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ramona, California
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Maybe someone can tell me why presta valves are so popular. I can see no real advantage of any kind using them over schrader valves. Maybe it's just a Gucci thing... Tom |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Regarding slime, I have also posted this question at cyclingtech talk forum with no results. Maybe I am just ham handed. I will probably do the next tubes with a q tip. Prestas are used mainly because, the hole they make in the rim is smaller but also because the mechanism is simple, with a floor pump they are easier to fill. I bet they are much lighter also. Ever try a Dunlop? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ramona, California
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
I can certainly see where you would need a presta valve tube with road wheels, because of the narrow width. With mountain bike rims, that isn an issue. I have bought rims that come drilled for schrader, but have a presta insert (adapter). As far as simplicity, I really don't see how a presta is simpler than a schrader valve. Nothing to open and close. No adapters required for pumps or compressors. As far as weight is concerned, there can't be more that a few grams difference, but don't know for sure. If you can tell the difference, you're probably a hell of a lot better rider than I amhttp://www.cyclingforums.com/images/icons/icon12.gif Anyway, I think it must be a personal preference thing. All I know, though, is since I've changed to schrader, I can slime my tubes with no problems, and other than that, I can't tell the difference as to what tube is in my tire. Tom |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
The other thing is I want to use the same valve for all my bikes, it’s easier with the pumps. And I already own 5 presta MTB rims. And the main bike with thorn problems is a cyclocross bike. One other reason to use presta I think, is that they may be a bit easier to mount with the valve straight. And they have that cool little collar. Dunlops are still common in Germany and maybe other places somewhat like a shrader you can disassemble. Its quite annoying to use one bc the valve is slightly different diameter requiring a change with the chuck. I was very confused the first time I got one! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ramona, California
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Okay, if I had several bikes, I would use a common valve type, too...that makes a lot of sense. I'll have to do a search on the Dunlop. I've never seen one. Good luck solving your Slime problem. Tom |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not where I would like to be
Posts: 341
|
Quote:
Not sure if they do it for presta tubes but you can buy pre-slimed tubes in the schrader style. Might be worth checking to see if presta is also available. The price I paid for a single tube would be equivalent to buying a normal tube plus the slime (only you don't have the hassle of trying to get the slime in ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
|
i switched to tubeless using mavic dee max wheels (ust) and continental tires (ust) i als put in a bit of stans no tubes fluid in case of thorns
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
i dunno if anyone has already said this cause i dont have time to read everything but how about give up with slime because its crap and use notubes, get a rimstrip and fluid and it'll be lighter and its piss easy to use
__________________
GT Ruckus SS 2006 Giant Trance 1 Giant TCR Euro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
|
Thanks moparchris
i dunno if anyone has already ect ect |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
|
Previously I asked about controlling the presta core, when installing slime. However I realized I have access to hypodermic needles. Why not let the air out and inject the tires? Has anyone tried this? A needle hole should certainly seal much quicker/reliably than a thorn hole. Right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
|
Ive got presta valves, and i simply used slime liners instead, they might be a little heavier but they stop a puncture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9
|
i dont like slime, its not very good and pricey.
__________________
Im new >_<
|
|
|
|