![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 39
|
Are here some users of the ergomo pro powermeter ?
experiences ? pros/contras |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
|
Quote:
Friend of mine uses it, loves it. Big CPU (SRM has the same issue, especially on most aerobars), early adopters got screwed - production problems but all got repaired under warranty, very inconvenient if you want to ride more than one bike, comes with cyclingpeaks software, installation requires a bit more technical expertise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 337
|
Do you have the dimensions of the SRM and Ergomo CPUs?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 39
|
why should dimensions be an issue ?
What I'm trying to find out , does it function good , in every condition ? Can you rely on it ? I don't like the fact that powertap goes in the rear wheel and because I often ride indoors (with other wheel with special indoor tire) that would be unusable for me |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Ergomo only measures the torque and hence power from your left leg and then doubles the amount because it measures the twist of the bottom bracket. The SRM system and the Powertap system measure total torque throught the drive train from both legs and are therefore much better since most people develop quite different levels of power from each leg. Other than that the system is accurate.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
I got a box in the basement from Ergomo. I'll go open it and measure the CPU. ![]()
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
It is ~7cm wide, ~8.5cm high and ~3cm thick(although this measurement varies greatly on how you measure it). FWIW the viewing area is 5cm wide and 3.5cm high. Hope this helps.
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PHX, AZ
Posts: 93
|
So Ovalmaster.... Let me get this straight.... You pedal better with one than with the other? If so then the rgomo would be a problem. There are a fair number of Pros using it out there. I guess your rebuttal would be that pros don't have uneven pedal strokes
I have one and I have a PT pro. they tell me my power is similar from both. Differences within drivetrain loss and accuracy variances. So either I'm just one of the few/ lucky people with an even pedal stroke or it's less of a problem than you might think. Oh the Ergomo pro is on my Scott CR1 and the Powertap Pro is is on my Colnago Master light. I'm selling one PT Pro if anyone interested though And I'll put another ergomo BB in the Colnago with the proceeds.Oh as for durability. One more thing. Hunter Allen used on on the La Ruta De Conquistadores Mtn. Bike race without so much as a hiccup. If it can survive through that water and mud soaked extravaganza it can take anything a mere mortal can throw at it. Last edited by jerryz : 23-01.-2006 at 06:27 AM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 337
|
The SRM PCV is 80 x 54 x 14 mm, also depending on where you measure it.
Did you measure the old or new Ergomo computer? Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
My fault, I have an old model from last spring/summer NIB.
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
|
Quote:
You asked for pros and cons. There are quite a few people who don't like the aesthetics of a really big CPU on their handlebars. You are not one of them but someone else reading this probably is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 337
|
Both the current SRM and Ergomo computers are smaller than their predecessors. Judging from pictures though, the new Ergomo computer seems disproportionately tall but it's not the monstrousity the previous computer was.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
|
Quote:
Yes, the only person I know with one has the original godzilla model. Not very common around here either. One thing about that is if you have a powermeter that some other people around you might have, that makes it much easier to troubleshoot some types of problems. I see a lot of PowerTaps and some SRMs around the neighborhood. I have a SRM V CPU and I really wish it was smaller and fit on my stem... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|