![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,674
|
I just finished reading Thomas Prehn's Racing Tactics for Cyclists and found it to be a good read. One question, though, is his use of the term 'echelon.' In chapter 2 he discusses the efficient and effective use of a pacelines in bike racing. He defines a paceline as a line of riders where one rider pulls for a certain length of time at the front, then pulls off, and an echelon as a line of riders which are continuously rotating without a distinct pause at the head of the line. He even has a diagram where the riders are in 2 continuous straight lines, with arrows showing the method of rotation.
Now although I'm fairly new to bike racing, I'm no stranger to the english language, and I know that the more widely used definition of the word 'echelon' means a formation where the units are staggered behind and somewhat to the side of the unit in front (ie, a diagonal line), such as would be used by riders in a crosswind. Here are my questions: are continuously rotating pacelines typically *only* used in crosswind situations (such that they are always staggered in an echelon)? Does 'echelon' refer to the rotation method in cycling specific terms, and are there straight-line 'echelons' in cycling? Is there a different word for a continuously rotating paceline other than 'echelon'? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 205
|
Yes, echelon usually means a group of riders sheltering each other against a crosswind. What he referred to as an echelon, is what we usually call a "through and off". An echelon to me, never meant there had to be a paceline, just a sideways barrier against the wind, sometimes with only one guy pulling the group. Terms like this can get confusing sometimes, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,674
|
Thx. Most of his examples do refer to crosswinds and staggered echelon tactics. It just struck me odd that there could be a straight ahead 'echelon.' "Through and off" sounds like a better term for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 269
|
it's a beautiful thing watching helicopter shots of bike races on the TV. after enough time out of the chaos comes order.
my dad would watch the tour and see a bunch of riders, i see the dynamics of guys moving up the side, the echelons, through and off, etc. meanwhile a soccer game to him has patterns but to me its just a load of guys randomly running around a field anyway back on topic, i would reserve echelon for the diagonal line into a crosswind. the double paceline is apparently sometimes called "the ball", requires more riders to make it work, and i think it's more commonly seen when the hammer is down - shorter turns at higher gas.
__________________
I am my favorite rider. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 121
|
I, too, was confused about his use of the term when I first read his book. He is the first author I have read who refers to a rotating paceline as an "echelon".
Every other author I have read who uses the term "echelon" is referrring to a staggered formation of riders dealing with a crosswind. Prehn calls both formations an "echelon", apparently based on the fact that the front riders are continuously pulling off and rotating to the back. His racing credentials are a lot better than mine, so I'm not about to call him out on his use of semantics. Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,674
|
Quote:
I'm with you there. At the same time I don't want to sound like a dork trying to organize an 'echelon' in a headwind. Funny thing is, there was a strong crosswind on a group ride the other day and one of my teammates says "Echelon, echelon." I moved over to the far windward side of the shoulder to give everyone room to string out diagonally in my shelter, and continued to pull. At the end of the ride he asks "Why didn't you rotate off, didn't you hear me say 'echelon'?" Apparently one of the ex-pros on our team had told him that an echelon implies a continuous rotation, so I don't know what to think. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Maybe it's common in some places to use echelon to refer to rotation durations, but I have never heard it used that way before. OTOH, I have never actually heard anyone actually talk aloud about riding in a stagger (echelon). When the wind is a crosswind, it is always assumed that riders are going to ride at a stagger. Personally, if I ride at a staggered and overlapped position, I say something to the guy in front of me so he knows I am there. It's no guarantee that he won't swerve in my direction, but at least it might cut down the odds.
|
|
|
|