Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


2006 San Francisco Race Pulled

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-11.-2005, 03:01 AM   #1
TrekDedicated
Registered User
 
TrekDedicated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moving to the South, USA
Posts: 1,105
Default 2006 San Francisco Race Pulled

I think this is a major blow to trying keep building the momentum of cycling in the U.S.

I mean, generating 10 million dollars in business revenue is awesome. I love how politics try to ruin everything.

At least the TdC will stay on the schedule..... hopefully...


http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/9182.0.html

Chauner pulls plug on `06 SFGP
By VeloNews Interactive
This report filed November 21, 2005
There will be no San Francisco GP in 2006, the race organizer announced Sunday.

An ongoing dispute with City Hall over police costs and billing practices has proved to be "a no-win situation, and we simply cannot go forward," said David Chauner, director of San Francisco Cycling LLC, which founded and ran the annual race.

"There is considerable uncertainty regarding the amounts we will be billed after each year's race, making it impossible to accurately forecast budgets or question charges beforehand," Chauner said.

"On top of that, the periodic, emotionally charged Board of Supervisors' debates over the value of the event make potential sponsors very nervous. Few companies will sponsor a politically charged event, and when sponsors back out or can't be replaced, we have to cut important elements of the race, like eliminating the very popular women's event this year."

City officials have squabbled for years over the race's costs. Mayor Gavin Newsom's office has said that the city should shoulder some of the burden because San Francisco benefits from race-related tourism, and in April, the Board of Supervisors agreed to pay much of the cost of policing the event in return for 40 percent of its profits.

But Supervisor Chris Daly derided the agreement as "corporate welfare." And other supervisors publicly questioned how San Francisco Cycling got a permit for the 2005 race after learning that organizers had not paid an $89,924 bill from the 2004 race.

Both San Francisco Cycling and Newsom's office told The San Francisco Chronicle that the company shouldn't be blamed for the delay in payment because the Department of Public Works only sent the final 2004 bill this month.

Race operations director Jerry Casale called misleading charges that San Francisco Cycling had failed to pay its 2004 bills, leveled by supervisors Daly and Aaron Peskin during the November 14 Audit and Oversight Committee meeting.

"We were faxed the final and adjusted SFPD bill for $89,924 for the first time on November 10, 2005, just one working day prior to that meeting," Casale told The Chronicle. All other city charges had been paid before we got our ISCOTT permit for the 2005 race. It wouldn't have been issued otherwise. And then they said we were late and purposely avoiding payment. That's simply not true."

The cancellation is a significant loss for the city, Newsom spokesman Peter Ragone told The Chronicle. A study commissioned by the San Francisco Convention & Visitors Bureau found the Labor Day weekend race generated $10.2 million for city businesses this year, though some North Beach and Fisherman's Wharf businesses complained that the race actually cut into their bottom lines.

Peskin, meanwhile, said the city is simply getting rid of "a bad actor that has repeatedly refused to pay its bills, or pay them on time."

And if it's bike racing that the city wants, Peskin added, San Francisco will host a stage of the inaugural Tour of California in February. Tour organizer AEG has promised to repay the city for the entire cost of policing the event, he said.

"The net is that San Francisco will be just as well off,'' he said.
__________________
TrekDedicated no more

Orbea Orca
Full Dura-Ace
Mavic Ksyrium ES Wheels


Wake Forest Cycling

The Small Biz. Guru
TrekDedicated is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-11.-2005, 02:30 PM   #2
cosmo_the_third
Registered User
 
cosmo_the_third's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 47
Default Re: 2006 San Francisco Race Pulled

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrekDedicated
I think this is a major blow to trying keep building the momentum of cycling in the U.S.
Yeah, it's tough days. San Fran can't pay the city, and Philly can't pay the riders.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php...ov05/nov18news2
__________________
-Cosmo
http://cyclocosm.com
(click the ads!)
cosmo_the_third is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-11.-2005, 03:21 PM   #3
friedmikey
Registered User
 
friedmikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 349
Default Re: 2006 San Francisco Race Pulled

I'm not too torn up over it. SF is going to host the Tour of California prologue, and Stage 1 is only ten minutes away, in Sausalito. The Tour will bring in big names too -- most likely bigger than the SFGP -- being a ProTour event. Seems to me that the city's just making room for a bigger, better event. I will miss watching the pros stuggling up Fillmore, but maybe only one race in SF is for the better. Residents, especially in Pac Heights it seems, can be very vocal and could be even more so if they were "inconvenienced" twice.
__________________

..:: M t T a m B i k e s ::..
friedmikey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-11.-2005, 04:37 AM   #4
cosmo_the_third
Registered User
 
cosmo_the_third's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 47
Default Re: 2006 San Francisco Race Pulled

Apparently, the GP may be moving to any number of places, including San Jose.

http://velogal.blogspot.com/2005/11...of-cycling.html

(scroll down some)
__________________
-Cosmo
http://cyclocosm.com
(click the ads!)
cosmo_the_third is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-12.-2005, 03:52 AM   #5
roundsquare1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SF Bay Area - California
Posts: 108
Send a message via Yahoo to roundsquare1
Default Re: 2006 San Francisco Race Pulled

Chris Daly is an ass. He is against just about everything. He's a 'look at me' jack ass.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TrekDedicated
I think this is a major blow to trying keep building the momentum of cycling in the U.S.

I mean, generating 10 million dollars in business revenue is awesome. I love how politics try to ruin everything.

At least the TdC will stay on the schedule..... hopefully...


http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/9182.0.html

Chauner pulls plug on `06 SFGP
By VeloNews Interactive
This report filed November 21, 2005
There will be no San Francisco GP in 2006, the race organizer announced Sunday.

An ongoing dispute with City Hall over police costs and billing practices has proved to be "a no-win situation, and we simply cannot go forward," said David Chauner, director of San Francisco Cycling LLC, which founded and ran the annual race.

"There is considerable uncertainty regarding the amounts we will be billed after each year's race, making it impossible to accurately forecast budgets or question charges beforehand," Chauner said.

"On top of that, the periodic, emotionally charged Board of Supervisors' debates over the value of the event make potential sponsors very nervous. Few companies will sponsor a politically charged event, and when sponsors back out or can't be replaced, we have to cut important elements of the race, like eliminating the very popular women's event this year."

City officials have squabbled for years over the race's costs. Mayor Gavin Newsom's office has said that the city should shoulder some of the burden because San Francisco benefits from race-related tourism, and in April, the Board of Supervisors agreed to pay much of the cost of policing the event in return for 40 percent of its profits.

But Supervisor Chris Daly derided the agreement as "corporate welfare." And other supervisors publicly questioned how San Francisco Cycling got a permit for the 2005 race after learning that organizers had not paid an $89,924 bill from the 2004 race.

Both San Francisco Cycling and Newsom's office told The San Francisco Chronicle that the company shouldn't be blamed for the delay in payment because the Department of Public Works only sent the final 2004 bill this month.

Race operations director Jerry Casale called misleading charges that San Francisco Cycling had failed to pay its 2004 bills, leveled by supervisors Daly and Aaron Peskin during the November 14 Audit and Oversight Committee meeting.

"We were faxed the final and adjusted SFPD bill for $89,924 for the first time on November 10, 2005, just one working day prior to that meeting," Casale told The Chronicle. All other city charges had been paid before we got our ISCOTT permit for the 2005 race. It wouldn't have been issued otherwise. And then they said we were late and purposely avoiding payment. That's simply not true."

The cancellation is a significant loss for the city, Newsom spokesman Peter Ragone told The Chronicle. A study commissioned by the San Francisco Convention & Visitors Bureau found the Labor Day weekend race generated $10.2 million for city businesses this year, though some North Beach and Fisherman's Wharf businesses complained that the race actually cut into their bottom lines.

Peskin, meanwhile, said the city is simply getting rid of "a bad actor that has repeatedly refused to pay its bills, or pay them on time."

And if it's bike racing that the city wants, Peskin added, San Francisco will host a stage of the inaugural Tour of California in February. Tour organizer AEG has promised to repay the city for the entire cost of policing the event, he said.

"The net is that San Francisco will be just as well off,'' he said.
roundsquare1 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet