Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Fork length and headtube stresses - experiences?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-11.-2005, 05:24 PM   #1
Toadie77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Default Fork length and headtube stresses - experiences?

Hello all,

This forum has been a big help for me working on my bike. I recently changed out my fork; the swap was easy and made a big difference. The only part that took some time was getting the star nut in the new fork tube, but that was my fault – live and learn – right?

Now my fork is 130mm travel and replaced a 80mm fork. I fox float allow you to adjust down to 100mm travel -- but why would I want to do that right?. Frame is an old specialized alum frame (hardtail). Now the extra 2 inches probably would void my frame warranty due to added stress of a taller fork (I’m not too concerned about the warranty at this point).

Has anyone ever actually seen a frame fail at the headtube due to a longer than manufacturer allowed fork? My guess s even if the frame “fails” it cracks, and does not simply shear off sending you tumbling over the handlebars. Any clarity on this would be appreciated.

My take on this is to ride my fork with the preload set very low – sag of about half the travel. This gets me close to the stock ride height, and allows the fork to drop into the bumps when riding. So I’m thinking that the added stress is pretty small, and my riding style is pretty tame compared to what most of you guys are doing.

The long term plan is to build up a frame and use the fork in the new build, but why not ride it now right?

Thanks for the help,
Greg
Toadie77 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11.-2005, 05:52 PM   #2
moparchris
Registered User
 
moparchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 294
Default Re: Fork length and headtube stresses - experiences?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toadie77
Hello all,

This forum has been a big help for me working on my bike. I recently changed out my fork; the swap was easy and made a big difference. The only part that took some time was getting the star nut in the new fork tube, but that was my fault – live and learn – right?

Now my fork is 130mm travel and replaced a 80mm fork. I fox float allow you to adjust down to 100mm travel -- but why would I want to do that right?. Frame is an old specialized alum frame (hardtail). Now the extra 2 inches probably would void my frame warranty due to added stress of a taller fork (I’m not too concerned about the warranty at this point).

Has anyone ever actually seen a frame fail at the headtube due to a longer than manufacturer allowed fork? My guess s even if the frame “fails” it cracks, and does not simply shear off sending you tumbling over the handlebars. Any clarity on this would be appreciated.

My take on this is to ride my fork with the preload set very low – sag of about half the travel. This gets me close to the stock ride height, and allows the fork to drop into the bumps when riding. So I’m thinking that the added stress is pretty small, and my riding style is pretty tame compared to what most of you guys are doing.

The long term plan is to build up a frame and use the fork in the new build, but why not ride it now right?

Thanks for the help,
Greg

going from 80 to 130mm will change the handling alot, it probably wont climb as well as it did now. theres also the possibility of it failing but on a bike meant for a 80mm fork going to 130mm will generally screw up handling quite bad, also with having extra sag.. when your climbing a hill and the weight is off the front the fork will lift.
__________________
GT Ruckus SS
2006 Giant Trance 1
Giant TCR Euro
moparchris is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet