![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
|
Hey guys.
I was just wondering, which of the two above bikes would you favour? I have had a write on the Dawes Giro 200, and havn't ever seen the San Remo in real life. They are of similar prices, and I would like your opinion of the better of the two. I like the low riding position on the Giro, but I guess this could be achieved by flipping the stem on the San Remo, if it's not allready low enough. What other differences are there between the two models? Any replies are apreciated, cheers, Mat |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
|
I too have been looking at these two bikes and also the Barrcuda Azzuri, and as a newbie would also be interested in any feedback from other users. Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
|
I ended up getting the Giro 300, found it cheep on mail order for the same price i was going to pay for the 200 (£300). It's great. Get the best you can afford, it will be worth it.
Mat |
|
|
|