Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
01-11.-2005, 07:42 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3
|
Face to face: Trike vs. standard bike on expedition
Hi,
I do loaded touring on my regular standard bike (sitting upright, Brooks saddle, Aero bar) using panniers. I'm interested in buying a tadpole trike for my next "expedition" being roughly 4000 mi/6000 km. I'm not interested in recumbents - only trikes. My main reason for buying a trike would be the speed increase. But browsing various forums and newsgroups it turns out that the speed picture is different. So I have a question for those who ride both a trike and a regular bike: Without talking about weight, rolling resistance etc, I would like to know if you go faster on a trike (with or without panniers). On my loaded touring bike I go 125mi/200km a day, even in mountains like the Rockies. Usually I'm only limited by the daylight hours. I average at 15 mph/24kmh. I know it's a bit extreme, but it would be cool to go even faster. Feeling that my power is used efficiently is VERY important to me - this is why I don't have any bike generators (like the ones in the front hub) or internal gear hub systems on my touring bike. I know recumbents and trikes call for a much more relaxed driving style which eliminates soar etc. But if I ride from dusk til dawn on my regular touring bike (and not biking when it's dark) I do those 125 mi averaging 15 mph (loaded with 35 pounds of gear) and that's it. The values are, of course, without hourly brakes, eating, shopping etc. If I cannot go faster/longer I will not buy a trike. This is crucial. I must admit that I'm the stamina type of rider - I don't like to waste excess energy because I know the wind resistance is squared, so I ride at 15 mph but for a LONG time. I would adapt this riding style to the trike. On my regular bike I usually bike 1 hour, make a 10 min break, ride one hour, 10 min break, at noon shopping, eating for 1 hour and so forth. I'm only making breaks to give my butt some rest (it might irritate a bit) and eating snacks. So, if I could eat snacks while riding the trike, because I would't get soar at all anymore - it would of course be interesting. So what are the experts saying? Can I gain 1-2 mph compared to a standard bike (we're talking loaded bikes here)? Thanks in advance, Lucas Jensen |
|
|
|
04-11.-2005, 02:49 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 48
|
Re: Face to face: Trike vs. standard bike on expedition
If you are comfortable on a wedgie, there doesn't seem a really need to switch, but if you can afford it, it sounds like you would do very well on a trike. The added comfort should allow you to go further with less breaks and/or rest days.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
