Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Power Vs Cadence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-10.-2005, 05:14 AM   #1
TooSloJoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
Default Power Vs Cadence

For foundation mile training, is it better to have a higher cadence with a lower wattage, or vice versa.

For instance, on a slight grade, i can produce approximately 260 watts at a cadence of 81-83 with a hr of about 152. If I spin a little more in a smaller gear, I can have a cadence of 92 with wattage of only 240 and a heart rate of 152.

So for foundation miles, which is better?
TooSloJoe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10.-2005, 05:28 AM   #2
acoggan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,622
Default Re: Power Vs Cadence

Quote:
Originally Posted by TooSloJoe
For foundation mile training, is it better to have a higher cadence with a lower wattage, or vice versa.

For instance, on a slight grade, i can produce approximately 260 watts at a cadence of 81-83 with a hr of about 152. If I spin a little more in a smaller gear, I can have a cadence of 92 with wattage of only 240 and a heart rate of 152.

So for foundation miles, which is better?


I'd say that depends: do you race, and if so, can you pedal smoothly at a sufficiently high cadence to be able to accelerate well, close gaps, etc.? If you do race but can't do the latter, then pedaling at the higher cadence during your "foundations miles" may be better in the long run. However, if you don't race, or if you do race but don't have any problem pedaling smoothly at a cadence that allows you to generate the requisite power, then I wouldn't worry about it.
acoggan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10.-2005, 05:32 AM   #3
TooSloJoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
Default Re: Power Vs Cadence

Okay, sounds good.

i was just wondering. I do plan to start racing again this year after a haitus, but dont have a problem with spinning. I am trying to increase my wattage output, so i thought that training at the higher wattage would be better.

Thanks
TooSloJoe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10.-2005, 06:42 AM   #4
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
Default Re: Power Vs Cadence

Quote:
Originally Posted by TooSloJoe
I am trying to increase my wattage output, so i thought that training at the higher wattage would be better.

If you're training by power, then don't let HR drive your intensity level. Pedal so that your power is in the right zone and just be aware that doing so at a higher cadence will produce a somewhat higher HR (ie, something to note, but not to worry about).

If your training plan calls for 260w, then don't stop at 240w just because your HR exceeds 152bpm.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet