Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Sport Science Support what benefits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26-06.-2003, 07:44 PM   #1
2LAP
Moderator
 
2LAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
Default Sport Science Support what benefits

Following on from a post made by Ric where it is obvious that much of the information that you need as a cyclist can be gaind from a power meter and field test (e.g. TT). Have any riders had lab testing or scientific support and what was the outcome. Was it a positive or negative experiance, did the information gained make a meaningfull difference in training or performance, did you get value for money, was it pointless.

I'm not really after the opinion of the sports scientists here (I'm one myself), but after riders opinions.
__________________
www.cyclingforums.com
2LAP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07.-2003, 05:37 PM   #2
Fooz
Registered User
 
Fooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 52
Default

I joined the UCT Sports Science Institute's Cycle Science program in Cape Town in May 2002, with the aim of doing a 109km race in 3h15m. My previous time for the race was 4h17m.

When you joined their program, they did a bodyfat assesment, a PPO (on a indoor Lode Bike), and a 20km TT on a KingCycle trainer. Once this is done, they worked out a program for you and then it was up to you to come in and train as they saw fit.

What was really nice, was also the race and training logs they kept, and every 2 months I would have to do a 20km TT to see how I was improving. I was also assisted by one of the dieticians to manage weight loss during the program.

Unfortunately in January 2003 the Cycle Science program was stopped, and I had to continue my training on the road, just using the information gained during my 9 months of training with them. That said, I had by then already learned the value of a decent training program, and using a decent HRM, applying what I had learned on the road was not difficult.

And yes, I managed to ride the 109km race in 3h15m07s, exactly on the time we were working towards! As for the value of science to the sport...I'm a believer!
Fooz is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet