![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 116
|
As a breed, us cyclists seem to be obsessed with weight. Whether its our bikes or ourselves, if we can reduce weight without too much pain or money, then we're interested. Now this is understandable (the desire to lose weight but not the obsession) for those of us who take part in endurance and hilly rides. But what about short distance time trialling (up to 25 miles)? On all except the hilly courses, I thought that the pursuit of aerodynamics was supreme, and that weight was a minor consideration.
Which brings me to my question: for short distance TTs, is weight important? If someone is of average weight and build, with a healthy fat content, is it worth the pain and hassle of losing that last couple of pounds or kilos? If it won't make you go any faster, is there any point going the Lance route (for example) and weighing all your food? And as for your bike, well who cares what that weighs as long as it's aero? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
|
Weight is less improtant during TT's, however the more you weigh the more energy it takes to move you!
With increased weight acceleration becomes more difficult, rolling resistance increases, etc. I'd stay off the pies if I were you. Oh, and I would never recomend that anyone be anything other than a 'healthy' weight or % body fat.
__________________
www.cyclingforums.com |
|
|
|